Respectfully, if you think entrepreneurship has anything to do with lottery or has an "already-rich" requirement to start with, I'd suggest you double-check whether you have an accurate mental model to succeed in this area (assuming you have an interest in succeeding in this area, which, if not, it's totally fine).

Respectfully if this reply is the best quality of posts you can produce I suggest you find another forum. Maybe 4chan is more appropriate for you.

Make a lot of friends, buy up the tickets together, and split the winnings.

Applied another way, everyone in a given class of YC should share a bit of ownership with everyone else in their YC class, and then everyone of them is likely to end up a millionare.

FYI this is an analysis of your average returns at YC: https://80000hours.org/2014/05/how-much-do-y-combinator-foun...

I still wish that YC would provide some more concrete figures, and ideally include separate figures for first employees as well as founders.

From link: “Most of the returns have gone to a tiny minority of super-successes. The founders of AirBnB, Dropbox and Stripe are worth about US$7 billion, about 80% of all founders’ equity, although they account for 0.5% of the companies. Outside of the most successful companies, it was still possible to earn significant returns. 12% of companies from the first five years of Y Combinator are now worth US$40 million or more, and a further 10% have sold for US$5-40 million. The remainder probably earned little more than their (low) salaries.”.

This is where the analogy fails, I think, because it assumes a static market price, or a lack of competition for the tickets. Where the price changes or competition changes availability, we run into the same issues where those who already have power/money are more able to exploit the system than those who have to collude just to have a shot.