News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Rare genital defects seen in sons of men taking major diabetes drug. Parent comment

Re:Rare genital defects seen in sons of men taking major dia... by pxeger1 on Tuesday March 29, 2022 @04:30AM (#30840168)
I think it means the genital defect is normally rare, but is much more common in these kids?
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Rare genital defects seen in sons of men taking major dia... by golem14 on Tuesday March 29, 2022 @04:59AM (#30840333)
Even .24% isn't that rare.

From NIH.gov:

"In the United States, a rare disease is defined as a condition that affects fewer than 200,000 people in the US."

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Rare genital defects seen in sons of men taking major dia... by ianai on Tuesday March 29, 2022 @07:00AM (#30841015)
That works out to 6.0341E-06%
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Rare genital defects seen in sons of men taking major dia... by eMSF on Tuesday March 29, 2022 @09:52AM (#30842519)
A condition which would affect 6e-6%, or 0.000006% of the US population (330M) would affect 20 persons. 200000/330M = 0.0006 = 0.06%.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Rare genital defects seen in sons of men taking major dia... by ccalloway on Tuesday March 29, 2022 @11:06AM (#30843541)
The deformity in the general population affects 0.24% of male babies, so 0.12% of the population.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Rare genital defects seen in sons of men taking major dia... by InitialLastName on Tuesday March 29, 2022 @12:25PM (#30844655)
GGP is still 4 orders of magnitude off.
[ Parent | on HN ]