Re:We can do better than “same, but electric”
by yellowapple on Tuesday March 29, 2022 @12:18AM
(#30838722)
Nuclear reactors are arguably a lot safer (in terms of meltdown risk) on the ocean than they already are on land, seeing as how they're in ships that float on a giant planet-wide heatsink that also happens to be exceptionally good at confining radiation.
The more pertinent risk would be piracy and the like; if thorium ever catches on, it'd probably help make that less of an issue.
Re:We can do better than “same, but electric”
by Swizec on Monday March 28, 2022 @11:41PM
(#30838506)
We already have nuclear submarines and aircraft carriers. The popular joke is that all military/navy/etc equipment is built by the lowest bidder.
On the bright side: if a nuclear reactor melts down in the middle of the ocean, there’s basically nothing around to be inconvenienced by that event.
We know how to secure a reactor on land, but the sea is a big, dangerous place - and it's only a matter of time before some cost cutting idiot blows up a ship because they wanted a bigger bonus.