News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Fuchsia Workstation. Parent comment

Re:Fuchsia Workstation by varjag on Monday March 28, 2022 @08:27AM (#30829759)
That doesn't address my point. Do you really appreciably save on binary footprint simply by using QNX versus trimmed down Linux kernel build?
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Fuchsia Workstation by pjmlp on Monday March 28, 2022 @09:45AM (#30830415)
You mean the binary footprint of a type 1 hypervisor that Linux requires when deployed in the same high integrity computing scenarios that QNX is usually used for?
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Fuchsia Workstation by varjag on Monday March 28, 2022 @03:17PM (#30834425)
The use case suggested by the GP was IoT/Home Assistant scenarios. So no, I absolutely do not mean that.
[ Parent | on HN ]