Re:Brewster Kahle and the Internet Archive still working to ...
by Chris2048 on Sunday March 27, 2022 @05:49PM
(#30824497)
it's not in the archives interests to get sued out of existence. Breaking the law isn't just "challenging" something - they'll lose in court and set a bad precedent for future challenges.
Maybe it should separate its activism from its legal, and important, archiving mission; rather than throw the baby with bathwater.
Re:Brewster Kahle and the Internet Archive still working to ...
by dredmorbius on Sunday March 27, 2022 @06:51PM
(#30824958)
I'm not aware of the Internet Archive being sued out of existence.
Re:Brewster Kahle and the Internet Archive still working to ...
by Chris2048 on Sunday March 27, 2022 @08:52PM
(#30825784)
so it can't happen?
Re:Brewster Kahle and the Internet Archive still working to ...
by dredmorbius on Monday March 28, 2022 @03:13AM
(#30827945)
It hasn't.
Which suggests that the risk may have been well-considered.
This could of course change, but your counterfactual remains that.
Re:Brewster Kahle and the Internet Archive still working to ...
by Chris2048 on Monday March 28, 2022 @07:05AM
(#30829234)
How does it suggest that? What benefit did IA derive from getting sued?
Re:Brewster Kahle and the Internet Archive still working to ...
by dredmorbius on Monday March 28, 2022 @06:07PM
(#30836219)
Getting sued provides for testing and asserting law.
Losing is the part which you wish to avoid.
Changing that regime requires challenging the assumptions and spotlighting the harms and costs. Which is what IA undertook. It's an activist cause, yes, and one aligned with the Archive's interests and mission.
To that extent, IA's action is entirely commendable.