News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:ReVanced by ChuckNorris89 on Friday March 25, 2022 @10:32AM (#30802629)
New pipe will do that too. Or just watching the video in the phone browser.
Re:ReVanced by Tenoke on Friday March 25, 2022 @10:39AM (#30802698)
It doesn't work in android chrome, I just tried. It does work in Firefox though.
Re:ReVanced by izacus on Friday March 25, 2022 @10:38AM (#30802689)
Or you know, paying a few bucks for the music via Premium subscription.
Re:ReVanced by ChuckNorris89 on Friday March 25, 2022 @10:39AM (#30802701)
>Or you know, paying a few bucks for the music via Premium subscription.

Or you know, not lecturing people off your high horse on giving their hard earned cash to your corporate overlords on top of their private data, and instead, letting them use the internet as they please.

A few bucks here and a few bucks there adds up significantly for those not on Bay Area wages and getting hit by rampant inflation and energy prices.

You can donate to the creators Patreon, PayPal or Crypto wallets, if you wish to support them.

If YouTube were a boot-strapped start-up in a garage, I would totally agree with your point, but instead Google-YouTube is a multi trillion dollar monopoly and I'm already giving them my private data they monetize, which is more than enough, there's no way I'm giving them my hard earned cash on top of my private data, while they engage in anti consumer behavior by removing the dislike button and using other dark patterns to squeeze view time out of small creators and "maximize engagement" out of their user base.

Re:ReVanced by izacus on Friday March 25, 2022 @01:39PM (#30805060)
That's some serious mental gymnastic you have going there just to avoid paying musicians a few bucks to listen to their music.

Don't worry, pirates have gone through these mental gymnastics to feel better about their entitlement since the time Napster appeared.

Still doesn't change the fact that the author of that post refuses to pay a shitty 12 bucks per months to get access to all the music he wants and pay both the infrastructure provider and the musician performing the tracks. They could easily pay for Spotify, Deezer, Tidal, iTunes or any of the other services if "YouTube is such an evil monster monopoly". But it's not about that is it?

I wonder if you're so lenient when someone refuses to pay for your own companys services and just wants them for free.

Re:ReVanced by daveloyall on Friday March 25, 2022 @02:26PM (#30805522)
That's some serious mental gymnastics there, too. I refuse to pay for YT premium because of the abusive relationship Alphabet/Google/YouTube has with my family, my devices, and me.

Bless the musicians, every one.

Re:ReVanced by FranchuFranchu on Friday March 25, 2022 @04:24PM (#30806694)
12 bucks is about two or three days of work where I live. I will do everything that is in my hands that won't get me arrested to save money and improve my quality of life. Google does the same, so why shouldn't I?
Re:ReVanced by MMS21 on Monday March 28, 2022 @08:34AM (#30829819)
Look up how much YouTube and Spotify pay musicians. I'm not sure how little the others pay in comparison but I assume their cut is the industry standard.

Paying £12 a month doesn't bring back dislikes, doesn't remove sponsored segments and doesn't improve the comment section that is ripe with bots.

>I wonder if you're so lenient when someone refuses to pay for your own companys services and just wants them for free.

I wouldn't make my own companies DRM so easily breakable, are Google too poor or something?

Re:ReVanced by LinAGKar on Friday March 25, 2022 @11:33AM (#30803396)
It's not "a few bucks", it's like $12 a month, more than most streaming services, for the privilege of having it not pause the video when you lock the phone. Which it shouldn't be doing in the first place. Also this yet one more thing on top of the subscriptions you already have. Can't subscribe to all of them.
Re:ReVanced by sofixa on Friday March 25, 2022 @01:52PM (#30805212)
There are more features than that. You get music streaming ( usually in the $£$ 10 range), no ads and offline downloads. It's really not a bad deal, especially shared on the family plan.
Re:ReVanced by LinAGKar on Friday March 25, 2022 @03:20PM (#30806103)
Losing ads, sure, and it would be good to pay them something, but IDGAF about YouTube Music (I have Spotify for that) or their watered-down download function (which I'm pretty sure is locked to playing the download in their app). So the 50 SEK (5.32 USD) difference between Premium Lite and Premium would be purely to make it not pause.
Re:ReVanced by formerkrogeremp on Friday March 25, 2022 @12:03PM (#30803826)
I'm not sure it's worth the $20 per month for a family plan of up to five either.
Re:ReVanced by sofixa on Friday March 25, 2022 @01:55PM (#30805236)
$4/person for music streaming, and all the video on the internet, without ads? What is a fair price for you?
Re:ReVanced by adalu on Friday March 25, 2022 @03:05PM (#30805939)
zero because they didn't do the creation work in the first place and they don't share their revenue with the creators. So how about that?
Re:ReVanced by ripdog on Friday March 25, 2022 @03:48PM (#30806378)
The hosting of an unlimited number of videos of (almost) unlimited length at up to 8k resolution for an indefinite length of time is worth nothing to you? I'm incredibly grateful that there is such a vast video archive on the internet with such liberal terms for video uploading and playback.

And Google does revenue share with creaters. Heard of the YouTube partner program? Partners receive money per view from people who watch ads or have premium, and premium views are worth more.

Re:ReVanced by sofixa on Friday March 25, 2022 @06:14PM (#30807517)
They share revenues with creators, and enable them to have a massive reach by hosting unlimited amount of video for free.
Re:ReVanced by formerkrogeremp on Saturday March 26, 2022 @03:44PM (#30814747)
I do pay that much for no ads and music streaming, but I'm not sure that giving Google more money in a monthly subscription on top of the money they generate from serving me ads is the best use of my funds. I pay that much because I hate YouTube ads. YMMV.
Re:ReVanced by LinAGKar on Friday March 25, 2022 @03:21PM (#30806105)
And if you don't care about their music service?
Re:ReVanced by ATsch on Friday March 25, 2022 @11:22AM (#30803257)
I pay for youtube premium and still use Vanced for all of it's advanced features, but background playback is useful for far more than music.
Re:ReVanced by Hasnep on Friday March 25, 2022 @10:45AM (#30802775)
YouTube premium isn't available in all countries yet, although it's in way more countries than it was s few years ago
Re:ReVanced by judge2020 on Friday March 25, 2022 @10:40AM (#30802710)
No, obviously YouTube should be a free service with no ads and no subscription. The content is someone else's anyways.
Re:ReVanced by fuzzylightbulb on Friday March 25, 2022 @10:43AM (#30802749)
youtube should be regulated as the monopoly it is.
Re:ReVanced by dvngnt_ on Friday March 25, 2022 @01:45PM (#30805130)
paying still doesn't give you all the features Vance offers for free so no