Re:If you’re not using SSH certificates you’re doing SSH wro...
by imwillofficial on Thursday March 24, 2022 @03:24PM
(#30794274)
That’s a fantastic point. Mea culpa
Re:If you’re not using SSH certificates you’re doing SSH wro...
by blueflow on Thursday March 24, 2022 @02:32PM
(#30793687)
Your pronoun thing makes your text painful to read.
Re:If you’re not using SSH certificates you’re doing SSH wro...
by jjulius on Thursday March 24, 2022 @03:14PM
(#30794173)
... it genuinely pains you to read "he/she"?
Re:If you’re not using SSH certificates you’re doing SSH wro...
by egberts1 on Friday March 25, 2022 @07:43AM
(#30800904)
That’s why I use “one”.
Re:If you’re not using SSH certificates you’re doing SSH wro...
by OrvalWintermute on Thursday March 24, 2022 @04:59PM
(#30795259)
I just didn't want to assume gender, and didn't want to go through comment history in order to find it.
In an organizational context, many organizations are not going to jump to creating a novel CA type (SSH CA) when in fact regular x509 CAs are well known and the basis for much security, and many in regulated industries are using them already.
Additionally, given that he/she is running an x509 CA, telling someone with that experience to study the fundamentals is not very polite. It assumes the author of the comment is not educated, but the very description of his/her use-cases are not simplistic ones.
Engineering is all about tradeoffs after all.