Re:Nearly 75% of US counties lost population last year as de...
by morganslaw on Thursday March 24, 2022 @08:26AM
(#30788840)
What does this mean for employee salaries? Will it become harder to find new cheap talent? Will our technology evolution be as dynamic as it has been?
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Nearly 75% of US counties lost population last year as de...
by candiddevmike on Thursday March 24, 2022 @08:44AM
(#30788982)
We'll automate the jobs that we can, and keep inflating our assets to ensure a healthy proletariat for everything else.
Re:Nearly 75% of US counties lost population last year as de...
by toyg on Thursday March 24, 2022 @08:35AM
(#30788891)
Was this a satyrical / sarcastic question, poking fun at HN attitudes?
It's pretty obvious last year was not part of a trend.
Re:Nearly 75% of US counties lost population last year as de...
by morganslaw on Thursday March 24, 2022 @08:37AM
(#30788918)
Re:Nearly 75% of US counties lost population last year as de...
by avgcorrection on Thursday March 24, 2022 @09:17AM
(#30789304)
Fertility rates go down—employers most affected
Re:Nearly 75% of US counties lost population last year as de...
by jelsisi on Thursday March 24, 2022 @08:29AM
(#30788856)
No, finding cheap talent is more an immigration problem right now than a population problem. The population still grew.
Re:Nearly 75% of US counties lost population last year as de...
by bushbaba on Thursday March 24, 2022 @09:06AM
(#30789183)
Population only grew due to immigration. This can quickly get ugly. Lack of workers leading to wage inflation. While demand could shrink leading to less buying
Re:Nearly 75% of US counties lost population last year as de...
by fundad on Thursday March 24, 2022 @09:42AM
(#30789623)
True. What’s encouraging is that demand kept up the entire duration of the trade war and over the last year as consumer prices soared to cover the cost of hiring back almost 10,000,000 laid off workers.