Re:Another Vulnerability in the LPC55S69 ROM
by steveklabnik on Wednesday March 23, 2022 @11:53AM
(#30779774)
I wrote this in the thread last week: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=30678324
Re:Another Vulnerability in the LPC55S69 ROM
by outsb on Wednesday March 23, 2022 @12:20PM
(#30780084)
Thanks. It seems extremely reminiscent of e.g. the Cobalt RaQ ( https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cobalt_RaQ ), but maybe "AWS Outposts for the rest of us" might be a more suitable contemporary parallel
[dead]
Re:Another Vulnerability in the LPC55S69 ROM
by bcantrill on Wednesday March 23, 2022 @01:15PM
(#30780815)
Sorry, did you just call Laura a "hipster brogrammer"?
Re:Another Vulnerability in the LPC55S69 ROM
by nextaccountic on Thursday March 24, 2022 @01:36AM
(#30786643)
Is it true that the intent behind Oxide is that the customer can only run images signed by you?
Re:Another Vulnerability in the LPC55S69 ROM
by stonogo on Wednesday March 23, 2022 @03:39PM
(#30782399)
Out of that tirade, you chose that to take exception to? Are we meant to interpret this as validation of the rest of the rant or what?
What is the intended application?