Another Vulnerability in the LPC55S69 ROM

Re:Another Vulnerability in the LPC55S69 ROM by outsb on Wednesday March 23, 2022 @12:20PM (#30780084)

Thanks. It seems extremely reminiscent of e.g. the Cobalt RaQ ( https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cobalt_RaQ ), but maybe "AWS Outposts for the rest of us" might be a more suitable contemporary parallel

[ Parent | on HN ]

[dead]

Re:Another Vulnerability in the LPC55S69 ROM by bcantrill on Wednesday March 23, 2022 @01:15PM (#30780815)

Sorry, did you just call Laura a "hipster brogrammer"?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Another Vulnerability in the LPC55S69 ROM by nextaccountic on Thursday March 24, 2022 @01:36AM (#30786643)

Is it true that the intent behind Oxide is that the customer can only run images signed by you?

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:Another Vulnerability in the LPC55S69 ROM by stonogo on Wednesday March 23, 2022 @03:39PM (#30782399)

Out of that tirade, you chose that to take exception to? Are we meant to interpret this as validation of the rest of the rant or what?

[ Parent | on HN ]