Re:Our fundamental right to shame and shun the New York Times
by cowuser666 on Tuesday March 22, 2022 @04:37PM
(#30771190)
That's exactly the point that was being made to you. The debate here is precisely what is reasonable, and what is harm.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Our fundamental right to shame and shun the New York Times
by alphabettsy on Tuesday March 22, 2022 @04:49PM
(#30771353)
The comment I replied to seemed to trivialize emotional harm and suggest that loss of livelihood might be too severe. Did I read too much into it?
I was providing an actual scenario as a basis of comparison. I think concrete examples are more useful here.
Re:Our fundamental right to shame and shun the New York Times
by cowuser666 on Tuesday March 22, 2022 @06:06PM
(#30772187)
It's not really an informative example. You're not losing your job in this case for emotional harm. It's because you insulted your boss. You could lose your job even if he didn't care.
If you had to let an employee go and caused even more emotional harm (brought on by their no longer being employed), you wouldn't receive a reprisal.
Why are you pointing out that speech sometimes is reasonable to punish? How does this clarify the question of whether we have become too punitive regarding political and controversial social speech.