Re:M1 Ultra About 3x Bigger Than AMD's Ryzen CPUs
by loosescrews on Sunday March 20, 2022 @02:50PM
(#30745409)
I think the Ryzen 6000 laptop chips are a better comparison. They are also monolithic, contain a powerful GPU, and are manufactured on a more similar node. Ryzen 6000 has a die size of 210mm².
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:M1 Ultra About 3x Bigger Than AMD's Ryzen CPUs
by wmf on Sunday March 20, 2022 @03:02PM
(#30745537)
M1 Pro is 251.3 mm² with a ~5 TFLOPS GPU and Rembrandt is 210 mm² for 3.4 TFLOPS so the comparison checks out.
Re:M1 Ultra About 3x Bigger Than AMD's Ryzen CPUs
by jagger27 on Sunday March 20, 2022 @04:07PM
(#30746124)
It's a slightly better comparison, however Ryzen 6000 is on N6 (which is an optimized N7 process), whereas M1 Max is on N5. N5 is considerably denser than N6.
AMD's next round of APUs on 5 nm will offer a better die area comparison.
Re:M1 Ultra About 3x Bigger Than AMD's Ryzen CPUs
by opisthenar84 on Sunday March 20, 2022 @04:35PM
(#30746354)
I remember reading that at 5nm, electron tunnelling through transistor gates would be a major problem. What happened to that?
Re:M1 Ultra About 3x Bigger Than AMD's Ryzen CPUs
by aunty_helen on Sunday March 20, 2022 @04:54PM
(#30746514)
5nm doesn’t mean anything is actually 5nm. It’s the “5nm node”
Marketing dept has trumped physics.
Re:M1 Ultra About 3x Bigger Than AMD's Ryzen CPUs
by imtringued on Monday March 21, 2022 @03:16AM
(#30751155)
That would be the case if 5nm didn't refer to a random feature of a reference planar transistor that is only used to chronologically name the process according to its mathematically equivalent density..