> I wish there would be journalists out there bringing facts first and leave the opinion about the facts for the reader. When reading the first lines it becomes clear to me, that I am reading a opinion based article, not fact based.

It's an op-ed essay. "The media" has always published stuff like this, and newspapers have a section dedicated to it. People are interested in facts, but they're also interested in what other people think and the ideas they have.

The content in a typical newspaper is extremely varied, and rightly so. Did you know they even publish cartoons, and have done so for more than a century?

I decided to look into this. And there's some interesting facts on the op-ed [1]. Up until 1921 op-eds didn't exist. In 1921 they were invented by an editor who remarked, "It occurred to me that nothing is more interesting than opinion when opinion is interesting, so I devised a method of cleaning off the page opposite the editorial, which became the most important in America ... and thereon I decided to print opinions, ignoring facts."

Oh the times when we were more honest. That paper went out of business 10 years later. He only allowed employees to publish said pieces. The modern editorial where papers began allowing "anybody" to publish opinion based articles only began in 1970, with the NYTimes.

[1] - https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Op-ed

> I decided to look into this. And there's some interesting facts on the op-ed [1]. Up until 1921 op-eds didn't exist. In 1921 they were invented by an editor who remarked...

Oh, interesting. I was interpreting "op-ed" to be the backronym "opinions and editorials page" rather than the more trade-jagon "opposite the editorial page," and as meaning a place for opinion content (which the OP was broadly complaining about) rather than news. Opinion content, in the form of editorials, has a much longer history, according to the bio of the editor you mentioned:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Herbert_Bayard_Swope: "Although standard editorial pages have been printed by newspapers for many centuries, Swope established the first modern op-ed page in 1921."

> ...thereon I decided to print opinions, ignoring facts."

> Oh the times when we were more honest.

That part of the quote seems like something that's very easy to misinterpret if one was so inclined. Opinions themselves aren't facts, but I'm sure some would be tempted to interpret "ignoring facts" as meaning an embrace of falsehood or lies, in order to take a swipe at the media. That's almost certainly a misinterpretation.

It’s an essay, not a field report. Persuasive writing. I thought it was interesting, and this isn’t some random letter-to-the-editor. You can read his opinion and form your own rebuttal (I’d love to read it, too!)

I couldn’t disagree with you more.

> An Essay by Mikhail Viktorovich Zygar

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Essay

It is common for newspapers to publish opinion pieces. It's fine as long as it's labeled as such.

In 1 telegram group, i saw increasing over the last week from 200 technical profiles to 3800 ( this morning).

Most of them want to relocate outside Russia.

I think it's more than an opinion though.

I heard that a long time ago Spiegel was a newspaper. Then some journalists went to prison (for a few days) and the rest is history.