This happens all over the world, even in the Western countries.

Some (most?) Western countries explicitly have laws against this. Fun aside: I used to work at a student library and management was very clear about us not being allowed to retain government-issued personal ID cards as collateral (instead of the university-issued student ID cards) because doing so would be breaking the law.

Of course human traffickers don't care about the legality of the practice, but there's a difference between something being widespread among criminals and something being culturally (or legally) acceptable without having to buy off police or customs.

And it’s horrific anywhere it occurs. That’s not a valid criticism.

Why is it always assumed that comments are arguing against their parent comments?

Western countries?

Pray give us some examples. Curious to know if this happens in Canada and USA.

Here is a case of this exact thing occuring in one of the wealthiest counties in the US, right outside of Washington, DC. The police were actively assisting the traffickers as well.

https://abcnews.go.com/US/wireStory/suit-fairfax-police-offi...

The difference is that when something like this is uncovered in the US or Canada, we get news stories and politicians publicly condemning the practice. When forced labor happens in China, their state media calls it Western propaganda.

Then why don’t the people rise up against their state? Why would it be the business of other nations to intervene in the internal affairs of another?

Notably, what is happening to Russia externally is different, because they first started a war by attacking Ukraine.

I guess not everyone is contented to sit and watch fellow humans suffer just because they’re on the other side of an imaginary line.

> Then why don’t the people rise up against their state?

Because the governments have taken away or undermined all ability for people to organize. When you have to fear every single friend of you being a potential informant of the Secret Service, how will you find someone willing to do anything that goes against the government? Rule by fear is incredibly effective, it was what held together the Soviet Union, Yugoslavia, the GDR and modern Russia and China.

> Why would it be the business of other nations to intervene in the internal affairs of another?

Because we as humanity should have learned something from what my ancestors did in 1933-1945 - namely, to not stand aside in the face of obvious inhumanity.

Historical uprisings look obvious in hindsight, but in real time, it takes some real chutzpah and/or desperation to say, "Hey guys, I've got this great idea. Let's overthrow the state!"

>Then why don’t the people rise up against their state? Why would it be the business of other nations to intervene in the internal affairs of another?

Because in general, from my experiencing interacting with Chinese nationals, the Chinese people either don't believe or don't care that their fellow countrymen are undergoing a systematic genocide.

Yes, that happens in western countries. Either on construction sites or for "household aides."

For the first the authorities in most western countries try to uncover it with raids on construction sites etc. The household situation is tough, as it is harder to see.

It does, but you won't know about it because they're frequently labeled as "unregistered illegal aliens".

This sounds like something a law could deal with quite swiftly?

"Jail time + huge fines for anyone other than law enforcement with a legal order or warrant denying access any document a person requires for travel."

Why not just scan all passports on arrival. Then if a passport is lost or stolen a fingerprint and biometric Id can just be used in place. The whole concept of a physical passport is so pre internet

Oh yes, but unfortunately the physical passport is enshrined in a ton of treaties that are very hard and slow to change.

There are also some nasty privacy and autonomy implications to digitizing the passport system.

This is not primarily a technical problem, but that doesn't mean it's not a very hard problem. Tech people tend to assume that every non-technical problem is easy. Often people, legal, ethical, and institutional problems are quite a bit harder than just making shit work at the tech level, and it is not just because people are lazy or inept. It's because there are loads of competing concerns and stakeholders.

Non technical problems are the worst. The type of problem would probably take tens or hundreds of billions of dollars in manpower to fix. The amount of meetings and negotiations is probably staggering

Get to know people at nearest local Vietnamese coffee shops, or Korean nail salons, etc. and you'll likely get some eye opening.

Does it happen with same degree and prevalence rates as the west?

Many hotels in Europe (and no doubt in other places) take possession of your passport.

A UK passport is the property of the UK government; as far as I'm aware, it's forbidden for a UK passport holder to voluntarily surrender it to a third party.

Citation needed. I have traveled a lot and I've never, anywhere in the world, had a hotel attempt to hold onto my passport longer than it takes them to photocopy it for ID purposes.

I haven't travelled internationally for a long time, so I withdraw my remark in deference to your greater experience.

I have, and I have had a motorbike rental place hold my passport as a deposit on the bike.

You are not crazy, I have experienced the same in many countries all over the world. Now I just say no