(Windows PC)
Why is functionally so different between the native app, web and teams. How is this an industry standard?
I edited a table, moved a picture and changed a footer. How can that be complex?
On a daily basis you could never tell which method of extracting a document would or wouldn’t work. Sometimes they wouldn’t open at all. Or would only open on web, but not desktop (or the other way around).
I was working in PowerShell ISE today and was thinking "this has to go" the whole time. So if I have any PowerShell work in the future I'm going to try the VS Code tooling for that.
I knew at least one person at Capital One who was using it for their Spring Boot project instead of Intellij.
Not least because one of the apps I used to use -- Panic's Coda -- had really severe keyboard lag issues in some situations, on hardware that should have been fine with it.
In my experience VS Code is plenty quick enough, not least when I am editing something inside a VM or on a remote server using the Remote SSH mode.
It might show a bit of keyboard latency but the Remote SSH mode more than makes up for this, for me; the sheer flexibility it offers me as a developer means I am going to ignore a bit of general latency.
And we've put up with worse in IDEs and programmers' editors, for sure.
One thing I would observe about speed complaints in VS Code is that they come from people who navigate through text mostly through keys; people with a vi or emacs back-story.
There is no doubt at all that it repaints more slowly than some editors when scrolling down through code line-by-line or page-by-page with the arrow keys etc., because of all the code actions that fire off when the cursor moves.
But it is not noticeably laggy when scrolling with a trackpad, because the cursor does not move.
This difference probably explains people's very polarised and simultaneously valid responses to VS Code.