News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Solid.js feels like what I always wanted React to be. Parent comment

Re:Solid.js feels like what I always wanted React to be by leonardopainter on Tuesday March 01, 2022 @06:12AM (#30512673)
That isn't a solution. Everybody moved away from this approach for web applications for good reasons.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Solid.js feels like what I always wanted React to be by pjmlp on Tuesday March 01, 2022 @06:47AM (#30512978)
The craziness of SPA frameworks running headless browsers, rediscovering SSR as if they are inventing something that no one else thought about, proves otherwise.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Solid.js feels like what I always wanted React to be by stickfigure on Tuesday March 01, 2022 @01:30PM (#30517973)
Having been on this ride since before HTML was a thing... I'm going to make a prediction: JS SSR will be a brief flash in the pan. In another ten years, we're going to look at it the same way we look at JSF today. "What were we thinking?"
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Solid.js feels like what I always wanted React to be by pjmlp on Wednesday March 02, 2022 @01:06AM (#30524300)
Given the WebAssembly adoption rate of frameworks like Blazor, plenty of people miss JSF and WebForms today.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Solid.js feels like what I always wanted React to be by imtringued on Tuesday March 01, 2022 @09:29AM (#30514529)
I agree, I am writing some apps like that and we still want some minimal level of interactivity that is suited to react. E.g. a file uploader.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Solid.js feels like what I always wanted React to be by leonardopainter on Tuesday March 01, 2022 @06:56AM (#30513053)
Well, I think when they moved away, they also increased the complexity of their applications as well.
[ Parent | on HN ]