Re:Solid.js feels like what I always wanted React to be
by leonardopainter on Tuesday March 01, 2022 @06:12AM
(#30512673)
That isn't a solution. Everybody moved away from this approach for web applications for good reasons.
Re:Solid.js feels like what I always wanted React to be
by pjmlp on Tuesday March 01, 2022 @06:47AM
(#30512978)
The craziness of SPA frameworks running headless browsers, rediscovering SSR as if they are inventing something that no one else thought about, proves otherwise.
Re:Solid.js feels like what I always wanted React to be
by stickfigure on Tuesday March 01, 2022 @01:30PM
(#30517973)
Having been on this ride since before HTML was a thing... I'm going to make a prediction: JS SSR will be a brief flash in the pan. In another ten years, we're going to look at it the same way we look at JSF today. "What were we thinking?"
Re:Solid.js feels like what I always wanted React to be
by pjmlp on Wednesday March 02, 2022 @01:06AM
(#30524300)
Given the WebAssembly adoption rate of frameworks like Blazor, plenty of people miss JSF and WebForms today.
Re:Solid.js feels like what I always wanted React to be
by imtringued on Tuesday March 01, 2022 @09:29AM
(#30514529)
I agree, I am writing some apps like that and we still want some minimal level of interactivity that is suited to react. E.g. a file uploader.
Re:Solid.js feels like what I always wanted React to be
by leonardopainter on Tuesday March 01, 2022 @06:56AM
(#30513053)
Well, I think when they moved away, they also increased the complexity of their applications as well.
Loads fast, easy to debug without tons of layers in the middle.
And yes, I also do manually make use of script and vendor JS libraries.
Naturally it only works when doing side gigs on my own, on big Web projects where my role is mostly BE/DevSecOps, I go with the flow.