That's fine, you can humpty-dumpty words all you like, but everyone else thinks that those things can be competitive.

However, note that literally the entire point of the author of the blog post is that he doesn't want to be competitive and does not see his own behaviour as competitive, but rather as collaborating on achievement, so it's super weird that you're snarking on him.

Absolutely not. You misread my argument (whether intentionally or unintentionally).

> That's fine, you can humpty-dumpty words all you like, but everyone else thinks that those things can be competitive.

You can humpty-dumpty words all you like, but "everyone" is just you.

It's not that deterministic, multiple choice games can't be competitive, it's that they need different things from your average solo sport to make them competitive.

The game has enough variety that getting a streak of "favorable" seeds is not going to happen. You might get a truly heinous seed that is basically unbeatable no matter what you do, but most seeds will be beatable exactly because you know the possible challenges so you can make decisions that give you the best chance of defeating them.

>But in my mind, the title of a competitive game are reserved strictly for games where the gameplay itself is performed against another player or a team.

Seems like a very arbitrary position to take. Competition is simply the exercise of comparison and raking against another human in any activity. Some games/activities are designed to foster and facilitate more competition than others.

Anything can become competitive, as it is a function of how people approach an activity, not what it is.

You can say that Slay the Spire is not a game designed for completion, but that doesn't negate the reality that some people clearly compete for records and leaderboards, and a competitive scene exists.