Re:Defensive tactics from the modern history of urban warfare
by SergeAx on Saturday February 26, 2022 @03:39PM
(#30481733)
This is extremely bad and distracting analogy.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Defensive tactics from the modern history of urban warfare
by dalbasal on Saturday February 26, 2022 @03:52PM
(#30481846)
Almost all analogies are bad and distracting, to some extent.
Itoh, I do think it gets across, coarsely, a point about the sentiment scape. Russian people's tolerance of Ukrainian suffering can't be taken for granted. Kievans haven't attacked them, or given Russians much reason to hate them. Hate is a necessary ingredient for that kind of war.
Re:Defensive tactics from the modern history of urban warfare
by InCityDreams on Saturday February 26, 2022 @08:02PM
(#30484159)
It's great to know someone else (coarsely) feels this way.
Once people introduce analogies, I give up as they
a) become a discussion about the analogy, or
b) result in further analogies, and further discussions not about the original argument.
'Bad and distracting'. Yes.
Re:Defensive tactics from the modern history of urban warfare
by jessaustin on Saturday February 26, 2022 @04:40PM
(#30482237)
Hate is a necessary ingredient...
Not when there is control fraud. Very few Americans hate Iraqis, Libyans, Syrians, Yemenis, Afghans, Palestinians, Vietnamese, etc.