News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Why We Banned Legos (2006) by dmonitor on Friday February 18, 2022 @06:46PM (#30392775)
Social obligation enforced by what? The sword?
Re:Why We Banned Legos (2006) by trs8080 on Friday February 18, 2022 @06:55PM (#30392862)
Cooperation, empathy, and a sense of duty.
Re:Why We Banned Legos (2006) by freeflight on Friday February 18, 2022 @07:59PM (#30393370)
It's fascinating how "patriotism" can sum a lot of that up, yet is usually only channeled for antagonistic jingoism against perceived threats from outside.
Re:Why We Banned Legos (2006) by trs8080 on Friday February 18, 2022 @08:42PM (#30393630)
Agreed. Pride can be healthy when it encourages self-confidence and community, but can quickly become dangerous when it's used to justify supremacy.
Re:Why We Banned Legos (2006) by Breazy on Friday February 18, 2022 @06:59PM (#30392890)
A man with a sword extolling the virtues of cooperation, empathy, and duty.
Re:Why We Banned Legos (2006) by drekipus on Friday February 18, 2022 @07:26PM (#30393133)
As long as he's protecting me from the other swords, tigers, bears, etc.
Re:Why We Banned Legos (2006) by cwkoss on Friday February 18, 2022 @07:24PM (#30393115)
It is hilarious and horrifying that people will read a story about teaching kids the importance of sharing and decry it as a slippery slope towards mass genocide.
Re:Why We Banned Legos (2006) by freeflight on Friday February 18, 2022 @08:10PM (#30393446)
Also in-line with comparing mask-mandates to Nazi Germany and the Holocaust.

Makes me wonder if this kind of hyperbole is just the natural outcome after decades of politics labeling all kinds of situations the "Next Nazi Germany" [0] or "Worse than Hitler" [1], often to justify foreign intervention.

Maybe Godwin's law actually predates the Internet.

[0] https://www.reuters.com/article/idINIndia-33603620080515

[1] https://apnews.com/article/c456d72625fba6c742d17f1699b18a16

Re:Why We Banned Legos (2006) by Breazy on Friday February 18, 2022 @09:38PM (#30393935)
The communist regime being mentioned by name in this discussion is Cuba. I'm not aware of any genocides attributed to Cuba, so where do you get this talk of genocide?

Answer: It's your strawman.

Re:Why We Banned Legos (2006) by cwkoss on Saturday February 19, 2022 @02:02AM (#30394983)
Where did Cuba come into this thread?

Is the man with a sword a specific person? What are you talking about?

Re:Why We Banned Legos (2006) by TeeMassive on Saturday February 19, 2022 @01:25AM (#30394844)
> I'm not aware of any genocides attributed to Cuba

Communist regimes are known for the opacity and media suppression. It's not like they'll tell the whole world about it.

And contrary to what is believed, Cuba is not totally sealed off the world and still relies on capitalism to survive (cigar, rum and tourism), which mainly prevented it from going full North-Korea.

https://www.therichest.com/shocking/the-15-worst-atrocities-...

Re:Why We Banned Legos (2006) by seanmcdirmid on Saturday February 19, 2022 @01:43AM (#30394916)
Batista also committed a lot of atrocities from a fairly capitalism-based position in collusion with Cuba’s wealthy landowners. Not that the previous regime excuses the current communist regime, but opacity, media suppression, and human rights violations are of course not exclusive to communism.
Re:Why We Banned Legos (2006) by TeeMassive on Saturday February 19, 2022 @11:33PM (#30403236)
Except nobody is wearing Batista shirts.