Re:SpaceX’s monstrous, dirt-cheap Starship may transform spa...
by qayxc on Friday February 18, 2022 @06:02AM
(#30384309)
> Don't tell engineers what they can't do.
I don't - just a small hint there: Webb fit just fine into an Ariane V fairing...
Re:SpaceX’s monstrous, dirt-cheap Starship may transform spa...
by signatoremo on Friday February 18, 2022 @08:54AM
(#30385659)
It does, at $20B cost. A simpler JWST that takes advantage of the large fairing of Starship will cost less and take less time to build
Re:SpaceX’s monstrous, dirt-cheap Starship may transform spa...
by qayxc on Saturday February 19, 2022 @08:58AM
(#30397153)
You know what costs even less? Building a larger fairing.
Atlas V has different fairing sizes for different payload types as well.
Sure, a bigger fairing will simplify a space telescope, but you still need to fold it and the bulk of the costs went into developing instruments and the mirror.
There's nothing "simple" about a state-of-the-art scientific instrument. If you want Hubble 2.0, NASA has two of them just lying around for over a decade now; gifted to them by the NRO.
You know how much converting them to useful scientific instruments costs? According to the latest report, it's about $3.2 billion so please give me a break with your "simpler and cheaper because fairing".
Let's all quit at the very first obstacle!
Did you know that a lot of things don't fit into a 747, either?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Shuttle_Carrier_Aircra...
The lunar lander also didn't fit into a Saturn V.
Don't tell engineers what they can't do.