Re:SpaceX’s monstrous, dirt-cheap Starship may transform spa...
by snek_case on Thursday February 17, 2022 @11:04PM
(#30382016)
Nobody seems to think about space stations. You could launch much bigger modules with Starship, and many more of them, so you could create a much larger space station for a cheaper price.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:SpaceX’s monstrous, dirt-cheap Starship may transform spa...
by tigershark on Friday February 18, 2022 @12:33AM
(#30382465)
You can actually repurpose a starship as a space station.
ISS is 915 m^2, starship should be around 1100 m^2.
Now imagine using several repurposed starship as space station modules..
Re:SpaceX’s monstrous, dirt-cheap Starship may transform spa...
by freemint on Friday February 18, 2022 @07:16AM
(#30384772)
Rockets and space station have very different material requirements.
Re:SpaceX’s monstrous, dirt-cheap Starship may transform spa...
by ncmncm on Friday February 18, 2022 @04:00AM
(#30383566)
It makes way more sense to launch the whole space station in one piece. ISS is how it is because they couldn't.
Re:SpaceX’s monstrous, dirt-cheap Starship may transform spa...
by maccam94 on Friday February 18, 2022 @04:56AM
(#30383917)
But why not build an even bigger space station by combining payloads from multiple launches?
Re:SpaceX’s monstrous, dirt-cheap Starship may transform spa...
by snek_case on Friday February 18, 2022 @09:50AM
(#30386413)
Possibly, with bigger modules, you could build it in a way that each module is fully redundant, has its own power, thrusters, docking, etc. That way you'd have a fully operational station from the first module, and great redundancy if there was ever an accident.
Re:SpaceX’s monstrous, dirt-cheap Starship may transform spa...
by ncmncm on Friday February 18, 2022 @05:25AM
(#30384086)
We hardly have any use for the one we have. The best that could be done is one cheaper and better suited to the few uses we have discovered.
Re:SpaceX’s monstrous, dirt-cheap Starship may transform spa...
by WalterBright on Thursday February 17, 2022 @11:43PM
(#30382220)
Instead we are intent on crashing the space station into the ocean.
Re:SpaceX’s monstrous, dirt-cheap Starship may transform spa...
by ncmncm on Friday February 18, 2022 @04:01AM
(#30383570)
Without the space shuttle, ISS has lost its reason to exist. Without ISS, the shuttle would have had no reason to exist.
Re:SpaceX’s monstrous, dirt-cheap Starship may transform spa...
by maccam94 on Friday February 18, 2022 @04:59AM
(#30383935)
The ISS orbit naturally decays without regular boosts due to atmospheric drag. I'm hopeful that Starship is fully operational by the time the ISS reaches EOL, maybe a few Starship launches would have enough delta-V to push the ISS up into a graveyard orbit.
Re:SpaceX’s monstrous, dirt-cheap Starship may transform spa...
by panick21_ on Friday February 18, 2022 @10:29AM
(#30386962)
NASA has a commercial station program ongoing and they are handing out contracts.
BlueOrigin suggested station does have modules far larger then current ISS, but its attended to be launched on New Glenn, not Starship.