bash --version
GNU bash, version 5.1.16(1)-release (x86_64-apple-darwin21.1.0)In macOS Monterey 12.2.1:
┍ … Thu Feb 17 09:09:44[~]
┕ which bash
/bin/bash
┍ … Thu Feb 17 09:10:25[~]
┕ bash --version
GNU bash, version 3.2.57(1)-release (x86_64-apple-darwin21)
Copyright (C) 2007 Free Software Foundation, Inc. which bash
/usr/local/bin/bash
which ls
/usr/local/opt/coreutils/libexec/gnubin/lsImagine it, a system that you, and only you, control.
What apple sell is something that is accessible to the majority and usable by most. Their sales are testament to this as is the fact that several ios apps are generally higher quality than their android equivalents. This is a natural consequence of the average ios user spending more on apps. There are no two ways around that.
As a counter to you headphone jack argument, i could equally make the case that many phone users care about their phones working, not much else. Apple's products are quite durable and many here will attest to using laptops from 2015-2016 and phones equally as old.
The short story is that apple provide products and services that people value. Period.
That's what people make for Apple every single time they get burned. Apple lowers the quality of their manufacturing, people don't care. They remove features, people don't care.
The reality is, people are irrational and will stay in the pot long after the frog has jumped out. With other products, with other companies, people will absolutely not accept this kind of behavior. The nation empowered Teddy Roosevelt to bring down Standard Oil. Today's robber barons have slicker marketing campaigns and PR departments and social media managers.
Square stopped selling those in anticipation of upcoming remastered versions, but if you already bought them you can still download and install them, you can find them in "Purchased" in the App Store
So would I, so I'm not about to blame them for that.
Our incentives match. Apple gets the money they love. I get devices that actively work against third party tracking.
> Instead of offering developers a real userland, you get forced onto zsh because Apple would rather die than ship GPL later than v2.
export BASH_SILENCE_DEPRECATION_WARNING=1
brew install bash # if homebrew is installed
chsh `which bash` # if homebrew is configured correctly
Done. I've been running without zsh just fine. oh-my-bash even exists! https://github.com/ohmybash/oh-my-bash> Don't get it twisted, Apple hates you, and loves only money. It's only a matter of time until each and every Apple user is taught that.
No. Quod grātīs asseritur, grātīs negātur.
Nor is Homebrew supported by Apple which is totally outrageous, given that without it, you might as well buy an iPad for how useful MacOS is.
There are trade offs everywhere. Considering it takes an entire second to add brew to a machine, it's not a big deal or what I would hang my argument on. I've spent much more time messing with packages in Linux versus troubleshooting brew. I disagree it reinforces anything. I'm using a lot of rust tools on my CLI today and they're all available via brew, on Linux not always because the developer isn't targeting all of the different Linux package managers.
Behind the cutesy facade is a rapacious, consumer-hostile monster. The facade is paper-thin, and it's only a matter of time until you rub it the wrong way and it flakes off, then the monster will eat your money and anything you've entrusted to it. Apple products eat people's data, hungrily and mercilessly, then the company blames you when it loses it.
It will get the world hooked on their fashionable products then make them less and less usable. Those little mini-stereo to lightning dongles are the worst-made products imaginable. Guess what you can get a mini-stereo port on? An iPod Touch. Very brave, Apple.
Instead of offering developers a real userland, you get forced onto zsh because Apple would rather die than ship GPL later than v2.
Don't get it twisted, Apple hates you, and loves only money. It's only a matter of time until each and every Apple user is taught that.