> The cheaper to produce, the cheaper to use it for propaganda.
A video documentary with witnesses, CCTV footage, interviews and people identifiable as the researchers/KGB agents, documents tracing them, ... Makes perfect sense as source of information.
Additionally, you should realize that the US releases information to deter Russian action. If it doesn't happen, the odds are in their favor that they actually succeeded ( we'll see, since they release satellite imagery regularly).
As such, Satellite imagery backed claims of US > claims of Russia.
You shouldn't fix that date as an absolute. It's a current best guess estimate. You should know this by simple logic reasoning, so I'm just stating the obvious here.
False flags happened 2 hours ago. US warned for it 6 hours ago.
Removing every trade relation with Russia should be priority #1 atm.
It's literally Russians planting false flag ops. We've already been warned about this.
The Russian video convicting the Ukrainian attacks was literally made before it happened ( on the 16th of February and it happened in the 18th).
Why obviously?
> It's literally Russians planting false flag ops. We've already been warned about this.
That's a very poor justification, isn't it?
As for the “documentary”, it has nearly same value as “russian invasion” scheduled on Feb 16 and perpetuated by all MSM.
Sorry, I prefer other sources of information.