Um, the fact I've told any semi-non-competent person to buy iPhone because it very specifically won't screw up like the popup ridden land of Android.
How does this relate to your original comment claiming you're losing something you paid for?
You know that developers will end up using alternate App Stores.
Which means I will be forced to use them if I want to continue to use the app.
This keeps being stated as though it’s a foregone conclusion. All evidence points to the contrary. Look at Google Play. Android has allowed third-party stores since inception and yet the only stores that see any notable use are the ones that ship on devices, i.e. Google Play and to a much smaller extent OEM stores (at least in the English market).
So no, it is not likely that you will have to install another store. Just like most Android users only ever touch the Play Store most iOS users will only ever touch the App Store.
The only notable stores I expect to see from this are an Epic Games store that basically just has Fortnite on it, and some community-driven F-Droid-like.
If you are arguing that some people will be tricked into installing malware from other sources then you are right that this change would allow that but it will still require user to go through few steps which should raise red flags for them. Some people just can't resist pushing that button without thinking and regardless of the consequences and in that case app store safety net is just temporary anyway, they are still exposed to the real world where that will harm them in a more serious way.
I seriously could care less what we as HN want out of a phone in a way. We are head strong enough to do something different for ourselves -- literally look at PinePhone, etc.
What I'm concerned about is the trickery that is sinister beyond belief, getting access that they never earned and do not deserve.
Here's an example: https://youtu.be/VrKW58MS12g?t=406
This 'hack' is quite insane... Brillant and horrid... and I foresee it happening left and right.
Seriously though, I have a hand typed letter from the mid 80's running a similar scam.
If anything, technology has made this sort of thing riskier for the scammers.
Consider how you'd reproduce the vigilante's setup using 1980's technology. It probably wouldn't be feasible.
You also can't retroactively undo a security hole: once you've installed malicious software the other software on the system by definition can't be trusted.
Malware has made it into Google Play store which is Google's fault. Same has happened to Apple (https://9to5mac.com/2021/05/07/emails-reveal-128-million-ios... https://us.norton.com/internetsecurity-emerging-threats-ios-...) so you cannot be guaranteed to be safe just because you are behind a walled garden, you still need to think for yourself.
Allowing app side-loading or different app store is not a security hole. Using non-approved apps or non-trusted app stores might allow for existing security hole to be exploited more easily but it might also allow for better protection against such security hole by providing better curated app stores for less tech-savvy users.
That's the thesis for a treatise I could write. This breaks the contract I had with them upon purchase.
Any software license you may have purchased is a non-exclusive one. Apple can re-license their own software however they wish.
Genuine question, do you think that comes free? It costs money to develop these things and having control over the app store allows them to recoup that. I see no problem except maybe it's too expensive for developers. A more reasonable cut should be offered IMO.
The Chinese companies are getting a substantial subsidy; the Google Play store is blocked in China.
https://www.cnet.com/tech/mobile/just-as-critics-feared-fort...