No, sorry. The GME mythical doomsday that they have been predicting is not going to come.

There is no final reckoning, where GMR is going to shoot to 10 thousand dollars a share, and cause the world economy to crash.

There was a large initial spike, in retail investment, initially, and then when the hype went down, so did the price.

And that's that. The prophecy of the short squeeze isn't coming.

I'm glad you're confident. You have to understand that retail is also confident and it is directly registering its shares. When it reaches 100%, let's see.

Your position is not falsifiable. How long has to go on, with the prophecy not coming true for you to admit you are wrong?

As in give me a date. On that exact day, I can come back to you when the prophecy did not come true, and see if you are willing to admit that you were wrong, or if you will just come up with another excuse for why the prophecy is delayed.

Do you see the problem here? No matter what you say, if you give me a day for when the prophecy is going to happen, you can just make up an excuse later.

That's the issue with conspiracy theories. They are not falsifiable.

Your position is not falsifiable either. Show me the proof that they've covered. Of course you can't. But you're confident anyway. Based on what? You're certainly in the minority among retail investors. That makes /you/ the conspiracy nut, not them.

No one said this would take a day or a month. The expression is "diamond hands"; being patient is not easy. No one know when it will happen. But what we do know is that there continues to be a steady flow of investors whom are directly registering their shares every day.

Of course my position is falsifiable. If there is a massive prophetic doomsday, where the price of GME goes to 10 thousand, or a million dollars, and crashes the world economy, then my position would be falsified.

But with the prophecy predictors, the same is not the case. No matter how long goes on, with the doomsday not happening, a doomsday predictor can just make up an excuse for why the doomsday was delayed.

So once again, give me a date. Surely there must be a day, where if this goes on long enough, with no doomsday, that you will admit that you got duped, and this is all nonsense.

because I am happy to come back to you, on that day, to see if you are willing to take in new information, or if you will just come up with some excuse for why doomsday got delayed.

See the difference between your's , and my position? With me, if the doomsday happens, then that is when I am proven wrong. For you, if the doomsday doesn't happen, for however long, you can just make up a reason for why it got delayed.

Or, in other words, the doomsday is not falsifiable.

> /you/ the conspiracy nut

You are the one predicting a doomsday, supposedly right? Every day that the doomsday does not happen, is more evidence that I am right. Just give a date. Give me a day, when you will say "Well I guess the doomsday isn't coming". I will mark it on my calendar.

If you do not give a date, then you are literally admitting that your position cannot be falsified, because you are saying that no matter how long goes by, with the million dollar short squeeze, you will not be convinced.

I can be convinced. If price hits a million dollars, I was wrong. You can't be convinced, if you are unwilling to give a day when you'd admit that you got duped.

Most retail GME investors intend to hold and not set a date or trigger price. That's the strategy, actually.

Institutional investors that got caught naked short selling can manipulate the price and stall but they can't stall forever -- and every single day it gets harder and harder.

Will it go to $10,000? Who knows. There's a price not much above that which would crush world markets to the point where it would usher in the apocalypse. There would be intervention before that happened.

Very few of these GME investors are solely trying to make some money. They see a corrupt market place and they want to take it down. The SEC could have just done its job but it didn't. They could have stopped the naked shorting. They could have curbed the corruption. They didn't. Instead an army (make no mistake) of small retail investors are buying and holding and registering their shares. You may not understand it, but this is war.

And look at the vitriol. Flat-earthers? Conspiracy nut? It's funny because if I buy Netflix because I think the price will go up, no one tells me that. There are no articles saying, "Netflix's growth is over! Everyone sell! Please, God, sell!" Can you imagine the buy button (but not sell button) being turned off for Netflix for a day during a price run-up? Don't be confused. This is war.

If you want a date, let's give it two years. Who knows and frankly the investors don't care.

> And look at the vitriol.

The vitrol is due to the fact that no matter how long the conspiracy doomsday fails to happen, you will come up with an excuse for why the doomsday got delayed.

> If you want a date, let's give it two years.

So then, if in 2 years, the financial doomsday doesn't happen, you will admit "yep, I got totally tricked by an internet conspiracy, and have no idea what I was thinking, and I will try not be convinced by conspiracy theories anymore, and nobody should listen to what I had to say about any of this stuff previously"?

Or will you just make up another reason why the doomsday didn't happen?

> I think the price will go up

Its not about price going up by a couple percentage points. Instead, the issue is this unfalsifiable conspiracy, of financial collapse and doomsday that people are predicting, and will accept no amount of evidence to the contrary, no matter how long this doomsday fails to materialize.

Your vitriol is because you place a timeline no one else placed on a position you don't hold? So you're angry?

You're not angry at hedge funds for naked short selling? You're not mad at the front running? Did you or did you not see that the buy option was turned off for one stock on a critical day last year during a run-up in price and no one went to jail? You're not furious that the SEC has abandoned its job?

The retail investors doing this are all holding long-term. The motto is, "We just like the stock." Maybe they're sanguine because they think time is on their side or maybe they like the stock. What's the problem? The only one trying to put a date on it and losing their mind and name-calling is you.

Your righteousness feels false here.

You didn't answer the question. Will you admit that you fell for a stupid conspiracy theory and that absolutely nobody should take anything you say seriously ever again, if in a reasonable timeframe, this mythical financial doomsday fails to materialize?

Or will you just make up another excuse?

That is what I mean by falsifiability. If you do not say that you will admit that you were wrong, if this mythical doomsday does not happen, then by definition you are saying that you cannot be convinced out of your position, no matter how long goes by, without the doomsday happening.

I answered your question but you don't want to hear it.

So then the answer is yes, after a reasonable timeframe happens, without this financial doomsday happening, you will admit that you just fell for a dumb conspiracy theory, and people should not take what you say seriously?

That would be falsifiability, if you agree that yes you will agree that you fell for a conspiracy theory, in that situation.

If you make up an excuse, then by definition, your opinion is unfalsifiable.

You're making a straw man argument and attacking it with a lot of anger. No one investing in GME is on a timeline. No one. Could it there be a huge gamma short squeeze? Absolutely. The due diligence that Mr. Gill put together is impressive. A tidal wave of investors agree with him. Will it happen? Maybe. But that's all you get to know -- that maybe it could happen. In the meantime they're holding shares of a company that is doing pretty well lately -- and they know that time is on their side. They can just back and hold their registered shares knowing that's all they need to do. They literally use terms like 'infinity pool' meaning they plan to hold for a long, long time.

And being prepared to hold for a long time is key. Here's why: let's say it's true. Let's say that hedge funds did engage in naked shorting of a company seemingly headed for the dust bin. If this buy, register and hold strategy was for only x months, then the hedge funds can wait to close out their position. Right? Is that confusing? By saying, "There's no end," it puts tremendous pressure on these hedge funds.

I've listed several places where the markets have been shown to be corrupt and rigged. People still go to jail for insider trading but not for any of these other, much worse, market manipulations? And you ignored it. What has incurred your wrath, instead, is that a large group of people would buy, register and hold a stock they like and not state unequivocally when they were going to sell. That's what has made you mad.

The math of all of this is that either don't understand what I'm saying or you do, which means you're either a little fool or a giant asshole.

> No one .... is on a timeline

If you do not have a timeline for your predictions of financial doomsday, then that by definition means that your predictions are unfalsifiable. Which is the problem there I have trying to bring up this entire time.

It is a big problem, if you are literally saying that no matter how long goes on, without the doomsday happening, then you will just make up an excuse for why the doomsday got delayed.

That is a problem, because then the belief is not falsifiable.

Man, there’s a few of you left holding a random stock after a pump and dump you fell for faded. That’s it. That’s the reality. And somehow this has morphed into “we didn’t miss it !“, and then lastly into “this is war and we will take down the global financial system”.

Total nonsense, but entertaining in a car-crash kind of way.

And you say this for other positions that you don't like? Puts of $fb? Calls on $nflx? Of course not.

The reality is that hedge funds engaged in illegal naked short selling, confident that they would never get caught because the SEC has essentially abandoned its role. And a group of retail investors decided simply to buy and hold registered shares of that firm, knowing that simply by doing that, they could bleed those SHFs out or force them to close their position at a much higher price. There's a lot of due diligence out there that backs that position up if you want to look -- but you don't.

Here's the thing, you can like it or not like it. No one cares. However, it's worth noting that it's the only position you'll see be called names and screamed at. "Don't hold! Oh God it's been a year why are you still holding?! God! Stop! Please, stop!"

You misunderstand every reply here and elsewhere. Nobody cares that you are still holding. Nobody. What you do with your portfolio is up to you.

What people do care about is telling you that no, there isn’t some shadowy cabal of hedge funds with your name pinned to a wall under the heading “number one risk to the financial system”.

Continue to hold, but please do understand you’re quite deep in a self-reinforcing grandiose doomsday conspiracy that makes you feel special. None of which have ever historically bore fruit, not for lack of waiting and money invested.

I'm not holding. I don't own any GME stock. I've just been following the story.

> some shadowy cabal of hedge funds

You keep diving into hyperbole. It's just hedge funds that bought naked short positions and got caught by the market. It's pretty simple.

> Will it go to $10,000? Who knows. There's a price not much above that which would crush world markets to the point where it would usher in the apocalypse.

> Instead an army (make no mistake) of small retail investors…

> You may not understand it, but this is war.

> Don't be confused. This is war.

I keep diving into hyperbole? I think this conversation has run its course.

There's a reason I've been following the story. There is nothing new about hedge funds naked shorting (essentially counterfitting) shares, and nothing new in the SEC's refusal to do anything about it.

What's new here is that this is the first time in history that retail has simply used collective buying power to catch them out at it. By simply en masse buying and holding directly registered shares, it puts them over a barrel.

The statements that it's war or what could happen aren't hyperbole -- and I find that fascinating. We'll see...

Absurd. You could falsify the opposing position by providing data that shows significant short interest. Of course you will have trouble with this because all of the data confirms the opposing position.

On the other hand, your position cannot be falsified because you dismiss all of the available data as manipulated without proof.

Your account is only four hours old but you have a dozen comments in this thread, all of which are desperately pleading with people that the shorts covered, there's no squeeze possible.

Smells desperate.

Well, they suspect differently, that's not the same as knowing.

Sure. There is a lot of confidence on this thread both ways. No one will know until all shares are registered, which is why there is a rush by GME holders to DRS their shares with Computershare.

The markets have been corrupt for quite a while. This may be its Bastille moment.

I completely reject this both side thing. Every data point out there shows that these conspiracy theories are unfounded. Even the redditors who believe this nonsense have debunked them themselves through their own experiments (the shareholder vote, the DRS thing) and they keep pushing the goalposts.

There's no global conspiracy to hide shorts of GameStop. It's flat-earth level nonsense. The SEC report spelled everything out, I suggest reading it.

>No one will know until all shares are registered

So we'll never know, because it's obviously not going to happen. Retail doesn't even own half the shares, if redditors manage to hit 10M shares registered I'll be impressed. I really didn't expect to read this drivel on Hacker News frankly.

The DRS bot they use is also easily fooled. R/Gme_meltdown users regularly have false submissions accepted to prove the point.

While this is totally true, let's not forget Gamestop themselves announced that a bit more than 5.2M shares were registered with Computer share at the time of their last earnings report, with the bot estimating something like 7 or 8M based on average shares per post * estimated holder, so not that far off

That is hugely off, even if you assume 100% of the registered shares came from reddit, which would be a very silly assumption to make.

I see your point. My personal opinion is that sure the bot can't be trusted, but that when GME will give the updated numbers of registered shares, there will at least be 2 official data points on this subject... Depending on how high it is (only a minority of outside-of-the-US holders had been able to DRS as of October 30th, not the case anymore), we'll either get an estimation on when a full lock-up of the float would happen, or a new cycle of trying to find the next catalyst ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

It's been a year, every single prediction made by the weird GME cult has been disproven and they keep digging a deeper hole with ever more far-fetched and all-encompassing conspiracies. Textbook flat-earth nonsense.

>If you honestly believe front-running doesn't happen

This is also textbook conspiracy hogwash. "You really think that illegal things don't happen? How naive of you. Clearly that justifies our bonkers thesis about how millions of people around the world are conspiring to hide shorts for a single random stock". What does front running have to do with the insane theory that billions of short positions have been hidden for over a year now?

Last year's price action was a short squeeze that morphed into a pump and dump as retail poured into it (fueled by boredom and stimulus checks at the start of the pandemic). Then some low cost brokers ran out of liquidity which forced them to disable the buying of the asset, which paradoxically probably saved a lot of retail customers who otherwise would've been holding much heavier bags if the pump-and-dump kept its momentum until even higher valuations. This plus the general (and probably warranted) anti-wallstreet sentiment gave rise to all sorts of conspiracy theories.

That's it. Literally every single data point out there confirms this scenario. GameStop themselves said as much. The GME doomsday cult has been saying that the rapture (uh, sorry, "Mother of all short squeezes") was imminent based on ever more tenuous and far-fetched theories that always end up failing.

>If you're not digesting what you read and your thought merely mirrors what you're told

Top tier projection right there mate.

Your account is only four hours old but you have a dozen comments in this thread, all of which are desperately pleading with people that the shorts covered, there's no squeeze possible.

Smells desperate.

> The SHF have not covered their shorts

What is a "SHF"? What data do you base this on? Last I checked, short interest is around 20%.

That's the public information available. There are many ways of hiding short positions like with ETFs. Look at the XRT (an ETF holding GME). Note, I have GME in my portfolio, there's more to GME than the squeeze.

It is a video game rental company with some uninspiring financials. What more is there to GME?

I believe you are wrong about both statements in your first sentence.