Re:GDPR penalty for passing on of IP address to Google by us...
by mro_name on Sunday January 30, 2022 @06:42AM
(#30136159)
first I don't agree with coining any group as stupid per se.
Second, if they are a target group, a website has no excuse but to deal with them.
[dead]
Re:GDPR penalty for passing on of IP address to Google by us...
by mro_name on Sunday January 30, 2022 @06:33AM
(#30136087)
the car example again.
There is a legal framework that has certain requirements. Enforced by a court here. These laws are from elected representatives of the people.
So they are binding. Like it or not.
Re:GDPR penalty for passing on of IP address to Google by us...
by iqonq on Sunday January 30, 2022 @06:53AM
(#30136250)
Okay, and I made an argument of why I am against the law. That is all.
Re:GDPR penalty for passing on of IP address to Google by us...
by mro_name on Sunday January 30, 2022 @06:35AM
(#30136103)
and: many are forced to use the www if they like it or not. E.g. for tax or to get access to public services.
So there's no excuse for hostility but it has to be legal and layperson-friendly.
I always prefer to reframe it as someone with a very important, intelligence requiring job, say vaccine reasearcher, who doesn't have time to deal with your shitty UI when they want to print a document.
I feel the same applies here.