News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on United flies passenger flight on sustainable aviation fuel supplying one engine. Parent comment

Re:United flies passenger flight on sustainable aviation fue... by dijonman2 on Thursday January 27, 2022 @10:17PM (#30110346)
The modern media is at fault here, not nessecarily the company.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:United flies passenger flight on sustainable aviation fue... by robotresearcher on Thursday January 27, 2022 @10:46PM (#30110504)
The linked article is a press release from GE, the engine manufacturer, and its headline says 'in one engine' clear as day.

Do you mean the HN headline? As far as I can see, that's the source of consternation.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:United flies passenger flight on sustainable aviation fue... by thatguy0900 on Thursday January 27, 2022 @10:41PM (#30110485)
A little unfair to blame the company here, no? The fuel is 100% sustainable and it would be illegal to use more than 50% of it here
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:United flies passenger flight on sustainable aviation fue... by HWR_14 on Thursday January 27, 2022 @11:34PM (#30110736)
It's also unfair to blame the article. The actual press releases headline was correct and precise about this. The only place it got messed up was the HN headline.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:United flies passenger flight on sustainable aviation fue... by animal_spirits on Thursday January 27, 2022 @10:38PM (#30110465)
Nothing about it being modern is relevant to them missing specific information here. That's happened for centuries. But I agree nonetheless, we shouldn't fault the company for having a fail-safe
[ Parent | on HN ]