The window to deploy surveillance-resistant systems is running out

Re:The window to deploy surveillance-resistant systems is ru... by toss1 on Thursday January 27, 2022 @09:58AM (#30101310)

Okay, but that was speaking in the abstract context, and you're right, I was assuming the future tense and not unambiguously forcing it there in that line.

That said, another part of it was clearly in the future tense. >>At that point, we'll need two devices.

So, thanks for the alert, I'll try to be more clear next time.

[ Parent | on HN ]

Re:The window to deploy surveillance-resistant systems is ru... by vanusa on Thursday January 27, 2022 @03:16PM (#30105826)

All good, thanks for clarifying.

My main concern was the assertions made in the comment I initially responded to, several layers up. Whose author seems to have ghosted us, since making them.

[ Parent | on HN ]