vanusa

The authoritarian nature of the governing system in Russia makes it nearly impossible to gather such data.

Is she suggesting that there is no conflict in Donbas for the last 8 years?

That is very clearly is not what she's saying.

She didn't accept that academics can have opinions.

Opinions are one thing. Her concern seems to be with the fact that otherwise intelligent and articulate colleagues can be so naïve -- and to some extent, willingly self-deluded -- about the utter insanity their government is currently perpetrating on a neighboring country.

Right, but then situations emerge when it is no longer possible to be neutral.

You may be below average at interviewing, but that doesn't say anything about your value as an engineer (or whatever your profession is).

The two skill sets (interviewing, real work) have precious little overlap, practically speaking.

There's no need to "invent" what Putin has very clearly told us in his public speeches. Recreating "historical Russia in the form of the Soviet Union" is the stated goal of what Mearsheimer apparently considers to be Putin's bold act of non-aggression this past week.

What a mindfuck. Only an intellectual can come up with argumentation like this.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Grozny_(1999%E2%80%9...

And if this takes off -- we can be sure that the inevitable reduction in human staff (especially in stores in or near working class neighborhoods) is going to play really, really well for Amazon.

And be aware also that if such a group is accessible to casual outsiders - it is almost certainly being surveilled and infiltrated.

   Russian bank Tinkoff now offering to exchange rubles for dollars at a rate of 171 rubles per dollar.  It was 83 before the European/US announcement about targeting the Russian central bank. Currency market formally opens tomorrow. This is brutal.

The idea that this is a meaningful proxy for "ability to get things done" -- about that I'm not so sure.

Assassinated he was, but he wasn't en route to peace talks at the time.

But that's the whole point of LC grinding: to claw your way through enough of these problems until, lo and behold... there ends up being an 80 percent chance that any given "medium" problem thrown at you -- is one that you have in fact seen and worked on, already.

I'm just guessing at the 80 percent figure. But it seems pretty clear from the cult of LC grinding that one of the goals of this strategy is not just to learn general techniques for solving these problems -- but to get a significantly high percentage of these problems under your belt already, or nearly so.

While also learning to deploy the just the right grunts and moans and pauses to make your interviewer think you're seeing the problem for the first time, of course.

And the volume on these settles is quite small.

Aside from obituaries, we were talking about.

I know Australian government departments regularly prepare media releases that never happen (from friends in those departments).

News agencies, we were talking about. Not public relations departments.

And not very effectively, as the video indicates.

Some had very strong hunches. But that's not the same as "knowing".