Okay, but that was speaking in the abstract context, and you're right, I was assuming the future tense and not unambiguously forcing it there in that line.

That said, another part of it was clearly in the future tense. >>At that point, we'll need two devices.

So, thanks for the alert, I'll try to be more clear next time.

All good, thanks for clarifying.

My main concern was the assertions made in the comment I initially responded to, several layers up. Whose author seems to have ghosted us, since making them.