News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Naomi Wu video demonetized on YouTube by ghosty141 on Thursday January 27, 2022 @01:40AM (#30097008)
>its quite obvious that you are well endowed and using it to your advantage by wearing revealing clothing

What is "revealing clothing" to you. We are not in the 1900s where it's a crime to show a little ankle. Her clothing is nothing out of the ordinary in many videos.

If you have big boobs people will notice no matter what you wear, youtube shouldn't act different based on your body... If another youtube would exist who has very small "assets" I can assure you nothing would've happened.

Re:Naomi Wu video demonetized on YouTube by twofornone on Thursday January 27, 2022 @01:57AM (#30097123)
It's so weird that this is the default response.

Again, I'm not making a moral judgement. But the first three tweets in the linked thread:

1. Bare midriff and tiny shorts 2. Deliberately fully exposed cleavage 3. A tiny spaghetti strap

Wear whatever you want, but don't be surprised when you get sexual attention, and don't pretend that as a public figure who makes money off of eyeballs that you're not deliberately taking advantage of your assets.

It's like we're not allowed to acknowledge that people dress for attention without being accused of puritanism or shaming.

And while we're on the subject, it is disingenuous to ignore the fact that the female figure induces a instinctual physiological and psychological responses in men. Social norms around modest dress may exist for a reason beyond oppression or patriarchy or what have you. It's tens of millions of years of evolution - not quite fair to pretend that revealing clothing does not force an onus onto men to suppress visceral urges.

Re:Naomi Wu video demonetized on YouTube by rbanffy on Thursday January 27, 2022 @05:19AM (#30098572)
> the female figure induces a instinctual physiological and psychological responses in men.

No. We are not all that shallow. In order to cause such a reaction there has to be some context, some hint of availability. I like her. I enjoy her videos. I'd like to have a coffee or beer with her. I'd love to be her friend. I'd like to ask her a ton of questions (political, technical, social), but I am not sexually attracted to her. Even if I were, I know I'm not what she likes and that she's not single.

> force an onus onto men to suppress visceral urges.

The universe has no obligation to make it easy for a person not to behave like an animal. That's what the sizeable lump of tissue inside your head is for. It's not a space heater.

Re:Naomi Wu video demonetized on YouTube by dr_dshiv on Thursday January 27, 2022 @03:20AM (#30097706)
Yeah, but what about the music video and commercial advertising argument? E g., That sexiness is commonly used in western society? Why single her out?

Also, if it were about the "onus", where does it stop? I'm regularly attracted to women and OBVIOUSLY I have to suppress my visceral urges. Do you want women to wear a burkha?

Re:Naomi Wu video demonetized on YouTube by theshrike79 on Thursday January 27, 2022 @02:50AM (#30097534)
There was a video, by her, explaining this years ago. The standard for "sexy" is completely different in China vs USA.

Extremely skimpy clothing isn't culturally "sexy" or frowned upon in Chinese culture as it is in USA.

Re:Naomi Wu video demonetized on YouTube by nottorp on Thursday January 27, 2022 @05:14AM (#30098539)
> Wear whatever you want, but don't be surprised when you get sexual attention

(Lack of) Self control much?

Re:Naomi Wu video demonetized on YouTube by iamtedd on Thursday January 27, 2022 @03:35AM (#30097821)
As a gay man, I most certainly do not!

Please stop making such pseudo-intellectual sweeping statements.

Re:Naomi Wu video demonetized on YouTube by anonAndOn on Thursday January 27, 2022 @03:01AM (#30097589)
>the female figure induces a instinctual physiological and psychological responses in men

Yikes. That's some incestuous ideology. Thankfully, there are many men who do not suffer from such instincts.