News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Elsevier embeds a hash in the PDF metadata that is unique... by miki123211 on Wednesday January 26, 2022 @05:24AM (#30083791)
Over here (Poland) almost everyone does something of that sort.

Our ebook market is so fragmented that there's no DRM solution that all (or even most) e-readers work with. If you add in smartphones and car stereos (for audiobooks), the situation gets even worse. Therefore, most publishers use watermarking instead of DRM, usually giving you Epub, PDF and Mobi, which you can read on any device you want.

The most common form of watermarking, at least when epub is concerned, is a 1px by 1px div containing a nonsensical hex or base64-encoded string. There are rumors of watermarks in cover images and even the text itself, though. Apparently, sometimes spaces get removed or extraneous spaces are added, lines get split up a little differently, or some common spelling or typing mistakes are made. Considering the huge number of alteration points you have, let's say 10000 per book, even doing two alterations lets you uniquely watermark 10000^2 copies.

Similar things are done to audiobooks, whether by modifying the audio itself in imperceptible ways, or by modifying the internal structure of the mp3 files. From what I've heard, messing with how frames are laid out and what's in-between them is a common tactic.

Re:Elsevier embeds a hash in the PDF metadata that is unique... by aqme28 on Wednesday January 26, 2022 @06:21AM (#30084183)
What do they do with them? Are there criminal or civil cases with those watermarks? In the US courts I believe those secret watermarks would be made public at trial, so what’s the point?
Re:Elsevier embeds a hash in the PDF metadata that is unique... by miki123211 on Thursday January 27, 2022 @05:14AM (#30098537)
It starts with a letter that basically says "we know what you're doing, we're keeping an eye on you, please stop or you'll end up in jail". I don't know what happens afterwards; I know one person who got such a letter and stopped their illicid activities.

If you were serious about piracy and wanted to release books en masse, you'd probably use stolen credit cards, stolen accounts or something of that sort. I don't think that's the goal here, though, those watermarks are mostly for deterring casual piracy, sharing books with friends and so on.

Re:Elsevier embeds a hash in the PDF metadata that is unique... by darkwater on Wednesday January 26, 2022 @05:35AM (#30083850)
But how do they enforce this watermarking on the "pirate" afterwards? Only for big enough cases?
Re:Elsevier embeds a hash in the PDF metadata that is unique... by matheusmoreira on Wednesday January 26, 2022 @06:31AM (#30084265)
They probably disable the account of whoever leaked the copyrighted material.
Re:Elsevier embeds a hash in the PDF metadata that is unique... by s_dev on Wednesday January 26, 2022 @05:40AM (#30083884)
Probably a maintained whitelist.
Re:Elsevier embeds a hash in the PDF metadata that is unique... by newaccount74 on Wednesday January 26, 2022 @08:03AM (#30084932)
They could just call whoever leaked the stuff and ask them to stop.
Re:Elsevier embeds a hash in the PDF metadata that is unique... by amself on Wednesday January 26, 2022 @09:06AM (#30085512)
Wouldn’t the unique copies be 10000*9999?
Re:Elsevier embeds a hash in the PDF metadata that is unique... by ZetaZero on Wednesday January 26, 2022 @09:21AM (#30085685)
For the purpose here, the difference between 10000^2 and 10000*9999 is irrelevant