News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Facebook versus The BMJ: when fact checking goes wrong by ceejayoz on Thursday January 20, 2022 @07:43AM (#30008173)
> He must know this is wrong.

It's entirely possible to be well educated and amoral, either via genuine inability to comprehend or simply not caring.

Re:Facebook versus The BMJ: when fact checking goes wrong by mandmandam on Thursday January 20, 2022 @07:48AM (#30008214)
We know for a fact that FB leadership regularly discussed ripping off smaller companies business ideas (ie, Snapchat [0]. Not a sign of moral people.

https://www.ipwatchdog.com/2017/08/17/theftovation-facebook-...

Re:Facebook versus The BMJ: when fact checking goes wrong by mensetmanusman on Thursday January 20, 2022 @08:02AM (#30008344)
Ripping off business ideas is an aspect of competition (BK versus McDonalds), not sure it is related to morals…
Re:Facebook versus The BMJ: when fact checking goes wrong by annadane on Thursday January 20, 2022 @08:27AM (#30008579)
Oh come on. There's a limit to being pedantic
Re:Facebook versus The BMJ: when fact checking goes wrong by krapp on Thursday January 20, 2022 @08:44AM (#30008767)
Strictly speaking, there isn't.
Re:Facebook versus The BMJ: when fact checking goes wrong by mandmandam on Thursday January 20, 2022 @08:25AM (#30008542)
Sorry, what?

If I share an mp3 the record industry demands ridiculous compensation.

If I steal a paragraph in a college exam and get caught, I'm sent home without credit or refund.

If I sell a drawing of a certain cartoon mouse, or draw a red shirt on Pooh, I can literally go to jail.

... But if I invest my life savings to start a company based on an insightful idea and read of the market, a trillion dollar company can rip me off wholesale and people will call it "business" and "not related to morals"?

Please tell me that sounds as batshit insane to you as it does to me.

Re:Facebook versus The BMJ: when fact checking goes wrong by ceejayoz on Thursday January 20, 2022 @08:34AM (#30008665)
> If I share an mp3 the record industry demands ridiculous compensation.

If you look at the success of Britney Spears and spawn an entire market of popstar clones, though, that's entirely legal.

That's essentially what Facebook did to Snapchat.

Re:Facebook versus The BMJ: when fact checking goes wrong by mensetmanusman on Thursday January 20, 2022 @10:08AM (#30009782)
Usually general business models are not protected as intellectual property in the same way as bit-for-bit copies in the case of mp3s/writings. I’m not saying it should be.

The bigger issue that you are pointing to is that the tech companies are becoming large trusts that do everything and can leverage their size to win everywhere. E.g. see Amazon competing with Intel now.

The anti-trust movement needs to be stronger if society says: ‘wait, this isn’t a good idea to let one company win at everything’