Re:Letter from Union Pacific to LA District Attorney re: tra...
by HWR_14 on Wednesday January 19, 2022 @05:12PM
(#30001057)
It suggested that might be an issue, but note there were two prongs - no bail and extended timeframe for trial. Keep in mind, being denied bail won't extend your jailtime (if guilty) it just moves it pretrial.
Meanwhile, that same letter that spent 1/3 of a sentence mentioning bail talked about plea bargains for 2 paragraphs. I agree we have problems, but bail (or lack thereof) isn't the issue.
"In October 2021 alone, the increase was 356% over compared to October 2020. Not only do these dramatic increases represent retail product thefts – they include increased assaults and armed robberies of UP employees performing their duties move.
These individuals are generally caught and released back onto the streets in less than twenty-four hours... Even with all the arrests made, the no-cash bail policy and extended timeframe for suspects to appear in court is causing re-victimization to UP by these same criminals."
Agree - its early data collected and correlation does not equal causation but the bail reform proponents should be investigating if more if/else/case statements need to be added to the underlying bail-reform feature codebase to prevent site outages being reported by power end users.
I'm hopeful that they are.
See the other thread for more nuanced commentary - https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=29990457