Re:The story behind OS X’s Unix compliant certification
by the_only_law on Tuesday January 18, 2022 @11:03PM
(#29989816)
I recall reveal years ago, I hung out in a forum where the users where very pendantic about claiming emulation only refers to hardware level emulation, like on an FPGA, and everything else was simulation.
Interestingly, I’ve never heard that anywhere else since.
Re:The story behind OS X’s Unix compliant certification
by astrange on Tuesday January 18, 2022 @11:37PM
(#29990022)
This reminds me of a hardcore Scheme fan I once knew who was really mad about JavaScript so he would only ever call it ECMAScript.
Re:The story behind OS X’s Unix compliant certification
by yjftsjthsd-h on Wednesday January 19, 2022 @01:59AM
(#29990775)
Hackers have always been fond of pedantry:) It's like how I got really annoyed by people calling the whole OS "Linux", so now I typically refer to "NT, Darwin, and GNU/Linux" out of sheer spite. (I'm aware that this is not helpful to anyone, and I do scale it to make sure everyone can still understand each other, but as personal flaws^wquirks go I think I'm doing just fine;])
Re:The story behind OS X’s Unix compliant certification
by pram on Wednesday January 19, 2022 @05:27AM
(#29991923)
Oh I’ve run into this too, from trollish standards maximalists in the late 90s on IRC. They thought it was super hilarious to be overbearingly pedantic about W3C specs and such to random people.
Re:The story behind OS X’s Unix compliant certification
by willis936 on Wednesday January 19, 2022 @08:10AM
(#29993123)
I've heard the opposite since the term software emulation has its roots in mimicking architectures in software but full blown virtualization simulates the entire system in software.
Still, even today people tend to think of emulation as implying some sort of required slowdown. Unlike something like ARM or console emulation, most slowness in Wine has just been bugs rather than an inherent limitation of the concept.