News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Eyeo wins German copyright decision, sets legal precedent... by pgrote on Tuesday January 18, 2022 @12:11PM (#29982207)
I think that is a legitimate question. The issue becomes there is no standard or method to ensure acceptable ads. A static ad without javascript is acceptable to me. Maybe not to someone else.

But ... the ad industry would never accept a static ad more akin to a billboard than a tracking device. Many times in the past malware has found its way into networks run by the more highly regarded ad systems.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Malvertising

If a content publisher refuses to let people read articles without a subscription or with an ad blocker, I am ok with that. It is their choice.

Re:Eyeo wins German copyright decision, sets legal precedent... by josefx on Tuesday January 18, 2022 @01:01PM (#29983052)
> a static ad more akin to a billboard than a tracking device

The sad part is that you assume that modern day billboards aren't tracking you. All you need is a camera, a tiny computer and some AI. Once walked by a fully electronic billboard where the slideshow crashed, the log it displayed listed everything it could identify about people passing by, age, gender, height, hair color, emotional state, ... .

Re:Eyeo wins German copyright decision, sets legal precedent... by whimsicalism on Tuesday January 18, 2022 @12:25PM (#29982441)
> the ad industry would never accept a static ad more akin to a billboard than a tracking device.

Is JS synonymous with tracking? Why can't you just track server side? I don't see how removing JS from ads would prevent FB from targeting me on my FB feed.

Re:Eyeo wins German copyright decision, sets legal precedent... by IX-103 on Tuesday January 18, 2022 @06:52PM (#29987894)
Depends on the "ad product" being sold. For "I'll pay you to put this image on the page" ads you might not need JavaScript. For "I'll pay you if someone clicks on the ad" it might also be possible. For "I'll pay if the visitor sees the ad on the page" (which requires the ad to know if it is in the viewport), then JavaScript is 100% necessary. Likewise for "I'll pay you if you show the ad and then the person you showed it to buys the advertised item within the next 30 days". L

The ads market is a very complex and competitive industry. This means that practically every display side provider has their own special "ad product" to differentiate themselves. Almost all of these require JavaScript to implement their key features.

In addition there could be 4 or even more parties involved in showing an ad (publisher, publisher's supply side provider, advertiser's display side provider, advertiser, plus miscellaneous middlemen). These different parties may not trust each other, so they currently use JavaScript to send (via `fetch`) themselves information about the auction to check up on each other.

Re:Eyeo wins German copyright decision, sets legal precedent... by __MatrixMan__ on Tuesday January 18, 2022 @03:04PM (#29984915)
Without JS phoning home everywhere there's a 'share on Facebook' button, Facebook can only track your activity on their site.
Re:Eyeo wins German copyright decision, sets legal precedent... by atoav on Tuesday January 18, 2022 @01:38PM (#29983686)
Static non javascript file, hosted by the site owner.