Re:Activision Blizzard pushes out dozens of employees over w...
by thakoppno on Tuesday January 18, 2022 @01:19AM
(#29975768)
I agree with both your points. To be honest if the same signal is sent by merely confirming employment dates but not literally disparaging the former employee, I fail to see how there’s any additional legal protection. The implication is tortious interferus in both cases.
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:Activision Blizzard pushes out dozens of employees over w...
by eru on Tuesday January 18, 2022 @01:38AM
(#29975889)
That's why many companies don't give any details at all, whether positive or negative. This way your line of argument doesn't apply; not from a logical point of view and also not from a legal point of view: no signal is sent at all.