News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Activision Blizzard pushes out dozens of employees over w... by PragmaticPulp on Monday January 17, 2022 @11:21PM (#29975070)
They won’t automatically know, but:

1) Anyone in the industry presumably knows about this news. If someone’s end date at Activision Blizzard is January 2022, they’re going to have a strong suspicion.

2) Backchannel reference checks (very warranted in this case) will likely confirm it. Activision Blizzard wouldn’t confirm anything other than start and end dates and any candidate-provided references are going to say good things, so it’s important to network and ask somebody who worked there at the time.

Re:Activision Blizzard pushes out dozens of employees over w... by Fnoord on Tuesday January 18, 2022 @01:29AM (#29975833)
> 1) Anyone in the industry presumably knows about this news. If someone’s end date at Activision Blizzard is January 2022, they’re going to have a strong suspicion.

The first sentence of the article mentions:

> Activision Blizzard Inc. has fired or pushed out more than three dozen employees and disciplined about 40 others since July as part of efforts to address allegations of sexual harassment and other misconduct at the videogame giant, according to people familiar with the situation.

(Emphasis mine.)

For those who more closely follow Blizzard and/or WoW news (fansites such as MMO Champion and Wowhead), several people were known to be fired or left the past year. So the date January 2022 is entirely arbitrary by you, but also, important to note the following: some people left because of the scandal while they were not the culprit, or other reasons (many people were laid off because of, well, I can't say bad financial result but that was the reasoning. Also, state of games in decline). Just because someone left Blizz in 2021 does not mean much, but if you look into certain people who did leave in 2021 then, yes, you will find allegations. End date alone is meaningless though, and quite frankly falls under the definition of guilty by association.

Re:Activision Blizzard pushes out dozens of employees over w... by shultays on Tuesday January 18, 2022 @05:42AM (#29977342)
I guess one has to ensure that they don't leave a company the same time such firings happens
Re:Activision Blizzard pushes out dozens of employees over w... by TechBro8615 on Tuesday January 18, 2022 @01:08AM (#29975707)
You're probably overestimating the degree to which a hiring manager investigates a candidate, or even cares that a candidate was caught up in what appears to be a mostly political event (as far as we know from public information).

Do you keep track of the month and year of every corporate scandal, and compare it to the resume of all applicants? Or do you just say "oh, you worked at Blizzard huh, do you play WoW?"

Re:Activision Blizzard pushes out dozens of employees over w... by awb on Tuesday January 18, 2022 @01:12AM (#29975725)
Right, but if there’s an applicant from Activision in the next month or so that didn’t leave voluntarily, then it might warrant further inquiry.

Presumably some of these folks will need to try to find work ASAP.

But months or years down the road chances are slim it’ll stick out.

Re:Activision Blizzard pushes out dozens of employees over w... by bluefirebrand on Tuesday January 18, 2022 @01:42AM (#29975912)
> that didn’t leave voluntarily

How would you know this?

I sure as heck have never volunteered information like that.

Re:Activision Blizzard pushes out dozens of employees over w... by awb on Tuesday January 18, 2022 @04:27PM (#29986127)
Most interviewers ask some version of “why did you leave?” or “did you leave voluntarily?”

Not sure what the repercussions are of simply lying to the interviewer though.

Re:Activision Blizzard pushes out dozens of employees over w... by doktorhladnjak on Monday January 17, 2022 @11:30PM (#29975126)
A lot of companies will also say if the former employee is eligible to be employed there again. A negative on that plus a January separation date won't look good for those folks.
Re:Activision Blizzard pushes out dozens of employees over w... by tablespoon on Monday January 17, 2022 @11:56PM (#29975287)
> A lot of companies will also say if the former employee is eligible to be employed there again. A negative on that plus a January separation date won't look good for those folks.

I suppose that may mean something if you're playing detective with a former Blizzard employee's resume, but I'd be cautious in reading too much into "if the former employee is eligible to be employed there again" generally. I know of a company where HR policy is that all involuntary separations are ineligible for rehire, including things like downsizing layoffs.

Re:Activision Blizzard pushes out dozens of employees over w... by awb on Tuesday January 18, 2022 @01:13AM (#29975733)
Why would you be ineligible for rehire after a downsizing?
Re:Activision Blizzard pushes out dozens of employees over w... by barkingcat on Tuesday January 18, 2022 @01:22AM (#29975792)
You'd be surprised at the kinds of hr policies that makes their own sense, but has no common sense.

Most likely to avoid someone returning on false pretenses to retaliate against being downsized in the firstplace.

Re:Activision Blizzard pushes out dozens of employees over w... by Gibbon1 on Tuesday January 18, 2022 @03:27AM (#29976540)
Yeah that's the sort of policy a sociopath would think is a good idea.
Re:Activision Blizzard pushes out dozens of employees over w... by ketralnis on Tuesday January 18, 2022 @01:33AM (#29975858)
Maybe because when downsizing you pick the lowest performers that for whatever reason you haven't already fired
Re:Activision Blizzard pushes out dozens of employees over w... by tablespoon on Tuesday January 18, 2022 @03:32AM (#29976568)
> Maybe because when downsizing you pick the lowest performers that for whatever reason you haven't already fired

"Lowest performers" doesn't imply bad performers (e.g. a strong team of A & B players).

Also downsizing can happen in different ways. For instance: "we're closing this whole site and laying off everyone who works there," or "this project failed [due to bad leadership], so we're laying off the whole team."

Re:Activision Blizzard pushes out dozens of employees over w... by thaumasiotes on Tuesday January 18, 2022 @12:49PM (#29982846)
There was an interesting comment on HN a while ago to the effect that "I have personally seen one team laid off and another kept, while everyone agreed that the laid-off team was performing better, because the rent on the building they were in was more expensive".
Re:Activision Blizzard pushes out dozens of employees over w... by nohr on Tuesday January 18, 2022 @01:20AM (#29975777)
Because someone made a shitty policy.
Re:Activision Blizzard pushes out dozens of employees over w... by thaumasiotes on Tuesday January 18, 2022 @01:29AM (#29975838)
Presumably for the same reason that, after sleeping with your friend's wife, you wouldn't try to make friends again.