News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on Djokovic's positive PCR test was manipulated. Parent comment

Re:Djokovic's positive PCR test was manipulated by gcanyon on Tuesday January 11, 2022 @06:16PM (#29899838)
The probability that it ends his career is far less than the probability Covid will.

Why? Because mild cases such as the one he’s saying he had produced unreliable immunity. After a mild case there’s every chance he’ll get it again. And again.

There is nothing discriminatory about a country/tournament requiring a vaccine against a serious contagious illness.

Everything in your last paragraph is false.

[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Djokovic's positive PCR test was manipulated by yucky on Tuesday January 11, 2022 @08:24PM (#29901124)
Thoughts? https://airtable.com/shrbaT4x8LG8EbvVG/tbl7xKsSUIOPAa7Mx
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Djokovic's positive PCR test was manipulated by gcanyon on Thursday January 13, 2022 @02:15PM (#29925303)
That’s anecdotes, not data.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Djokovic's positive PCR test was manipulated by yucky on Thursday January 13, 2022 @04:21PM (#29927043)
Those aren't anecdotes, there are hundreds of them all sourced.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:Djokovic's positive PCR test was manipulated by gcanyon on Monday January 17, 2022 @03:28PM (#29971339)
I almost included the saying in my first comment, but it seemed snarky, so I didn't, and here we are.

The plural of "anecdote" is not "data".

Data is validated. Data is correlated.

That air table is like correlating the prevalence of pirates with global warming.

[ Parent | on HN ]