> Even if it were the same price, nuclear takes decades to build rather than years.
We are talking about closingexisting plants. Also, stopping coal in 2038 is no problem, right?
> Despite constant claims of its safety you wont find an insurance company in the world that will insure one without 99% of the cleanup cost being borne by taxpayer.
If markets valued the low-CO2 nature of nuclear, they’d be doing better, https://whatisnuclear.com/economics.html
> Even if it were the same price, nuclear takes decades to build rather than years.
We are talking about closing existing plants. Also, stopping coal in 2038 is no problem, right?
> Despite constant claims of its safety you wont find an insurance company in the world that will insure one without 99% of the cleanup cost being borne by taxpayer.
Probably because of the stupid government regulations? See also: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuclear_power#/media/File:Deat....