Re:How's Mozilla Doing with Do Not Track? Not So Good
by ez77 on Sunday September 11, 2011 @04:28PM
(#2984727)
When the IP standard was defined, was this bit purposely left undefined? Is this newer RFC really a joke, and nothing but a joke? How come the IETF allows just-kidding RFCs? I'm puzzled...
[ Parent
| on HN ]
Re:How's Mozilla Doing with Do Not Track? Not So Good
by sbierwagen on Sunday September 11, 2011 @05:12PM
(#2984859)
Note the date. Typically people submit joke RFCs on April 1st.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/April_Fools%27_Day_RFC
Also, RFCs are not terribly heavyweight technical documents. They're essentially memos, not ISO standards. Any (demonstrably competent) person can submit a RFC, and if it becomes popular, then the idea enters the standards track, and new, better RFCs are issued based on it.