News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:High-sucrose diets contribute to brain angiopathy and hig... by gruez on Monday January 03, 2022 @07:58PM (#29789582)
> Sugar. Is. Poison.

Only in the sense that bad things happen to you if you consume too much. I don't like that label though, because if you follow that logic nearly everything is a poison (eg. water poisoning), which makes it useless as a label. A more accurate label would be something like "substance that we're likely to overconsume and cause harm, due to human psychology/physiology", but I guess that's not as attention grabbing as comparing it to rat poison or draino.

See also, the noncentral fallacy: https://www.lesswrong.com/posts/yCWPkLi8wJvewPbEp/the-noncen...

Re:High-sucrose diets contribute to brain angiopathy and hig... by afcapel on Monday January 03, 2022 @08:40PM (#29790017)
"The dose makes the poison". Paracelsus already said it in the XVI century.
Re:High-sucrose diets contribute to brain angiopathy and hig... by whoomp12342 on Monday January 03, 2022 @08:33PM (#29789951)
have you ever seen a toddler on sugar? it transforms one into a werebear
Re:High-sucrose diets contribute to brain angiopathy and hig... by veonik on Monday January 03, 2022 @08:42PM (#29790040)
Toddlers are just werebears. The crash might be real, but there has been research into the "rush" part and its been shown that kids really don't get a rush. It's probably just confirmation bias on the part of adults. https://www.yalescientific.org/2010/09/mythbusters-does-suga...

Not saying we should feed our kids endless sugar, however.

Re:High-sucrose diets contribute to brain angiopathy and hig... by vidarh on Monday January 03, 2022 @09:00PM (#29790212)
I saw this with other parents when my son was small. So. Much. Confirmation. Bias.

I absolutely can feel effects from large changed in sugar intake, but the tiny things parents thought were evidence of a sugar rush were ridiculous.

Re:High-sucrose diets contribute to brain angiopathy and hig... by nouveaux on Tuesday January 04, 2022 @02:16AM (#29792248)
Its not clear to me that the study disproves that kids do not get a rush from sugar:

"Dr. Tamborlane, also from Yale, reported that children given sugar had higher levels of adrenaline."

I'm not an expert in human biology but doesn't adrenaline increase activity?

Re:High-sucrose diets contribute to brain angiopathy and hig... by jacobolus on Monday January 03, 2022 @08:43PM (#29790051)
Under discussion here is the long-term (not short-term) effects. The short-term effects are not, as far as I can tell, especially acutely dangerous, though they could be bad per se if experienced all the time (e.g. sleep disruption).

But toddlers can also be pretty wild with or without sugar. They sometimes get very excited when hungry, when tired, when woken from a nap, when lacking exercise, when frustrated, when separated from specific adults, when in conflict with other children, ...