News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:Bitcoin consumed 134 TWh in total during 2021 by endisneigh on Sunday January 02, 2022 @01:11PM (#29771631)
Inflation isn't a bad thing necessarily.
Re:Bitcoin consumed 134 TWh in total during 2021 by not2b on Sunday January 02, 2022 @01:27PM (#29771831)
Moderate inflation is good for debtors and keeps money circulating around the economy: those with savings can invest it in a way that keeps up with inflation. Deflation causes hoarding of money and economic collapse (like the Depression of the 1930s). Central banks try to manage inflation to keep is low but nonzero.
Re:Bitcoin consumed 134 TWh in total during 2021 by xiphias2 on Sunday January 02, 2022 @01:34PM (#29771918)
Can you explain how that Ponzi scheme works? I read parts of the source code before I invested in Bitcoin, and it looked to me like an open, honest system with easy-to-understand, clean code (unlike what Ponzi was doing, which is basically lying about customer deposits).

I had doubts about elliptic curve digital signatures being safe enough to hold my money (I’m still thinking of using Lamport signatures in a multisig, as I trust them more), but I don’t see other serious problem with the system.

Re:Bitcoin consumed 134 TWh in total during 2021 by topranks on Monday January 03, 2022 @08:17AM (#29780465)
It’s a Ponzi scheme cos it’s not being used for purchasing goods and services.

Bitcoins only value is it’s value relative to dollars, euros etc, which have purchasing power.

So ultimately all the Bitcoin has to be converted back to dollars, euros etc for people to see a return on their investment. The only way to do that is to sell the Bitcoin to someone else who has dollars (presumably for more dollars than you bought the Bitcoin originally).

So as the cycle continues each new generation of investors needs to find another bunch of suckers to offload their Bitcoin to and get their dollar reward. And they need that next set of people to consistently pay a higher price than they did.

Eventually people will struggle to find buyers and be left holding the bag.

This wouldn’t necessarily be the case if Bitcoin got used as a real currency. But that’s clearly not happening at this stage, people laugh at the idea of buying Pizza with it or whatever. So it’s just a Ponzi-like scheme. Tbh it’s more like a penny stock scam of old.

Re:Bitcoin consumed 134 TWh in total during 2021 by tor12 on Sunday January 02, 2022 @01:57PM (#29772230)
> Inflation isn't a bad thing necessarily.

if you are already rich...

Re:Bitcoin consumed 134 TWh in total during 2021 by imtringued on Sunday January 02, 2022 @07:46PM (#29775952)
If you are already rich then you are forced to invest your money for the benefit of workers. The fact that the rich own assets is not a mistake. They're supposed to own them. Savings must be invested, directly or indirectly or else people end up unemployed.
Re:Bitcoin consumed 134 TWh in total during 2021 by topranks on Monday January 03, 2022 @08:20AM (#29780492)
Inflation is worst for the rich with piles of cash sitting around (and it incentives them to invest which is beneficial too).

For workers it’s not a disaster if wages rise. For people with mortgages it can be great.

Re:Bitcoin consumed 134 TWh in total during 2021 by endisneigh on Sunday January 02, 2022 @02:18PM (#29772520)
Absolutely no inflation ever is a bad thing - see the Great Depression.