News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
Re:The Coverage of Theranos Is Utter Bullshit (2015) by crsv on Saturday January 01, 2022 @11:13PM (#29765754)
Never forget Medman77 with the call of the century on that one in the comments.
Re:The Coverage of Theranos Is Utter Bullshit (2015) by apahwa on Saturday January 01, 2022 @11:34PM (#29765858)
and that is their only activity on the site too
Re:The Coverage of Theranos Is Utter Bullshit (2015) by ncann on Saturday January 01, 2022 @11:38PM (#29765873)
That account was created the same day the comment was posted, most likely for the single purpose of posting the comment. Makes me think it's either an insider or someone with beef against the company.
Re:The Coverage of Theranos Is Utter Bullshit (2015) by hitekker on Sunday January 02, 2022 @02:17AM (#29766589)
> someone with beef against the company.

Someone who turned out to be dead right.

Re:The Coverage of Theranos Is Utter Bullshit (2015) by somedude895 on Sunday January 02, 2022 @04:58AM (#29767346)
People create throwaway accounts to post comments all the time, so that conjecture is quite far fetched.
Re:The Coverage of Theranos Is Utter Bullshit (2015) by sydthrowaway on Saturday January 01, 2022 @11:30PM (#29765840)
Please link to the comment
Re:The Coverage of Theranos Is Utter Bullshit (2015) by umanwizard on Saturday January 01, 2022 @11:31PM (#29765845)
Re:The Coverage of Theranos Is Utter Bullshit (2015) by caseyf7 on Saturday January 01, 2022 @11:35PM (#29765860)
And notice how it was downvoted to near the bottom of the page. Not all of the best/well informed comments rise to the top.
Re:The Coverage of Theranos Is Utter Bullshit (2015) by divbzero on Sunday January 02, 2022 @12:03AM (#29765993)
At the time, that comment could easily be read as angry and irrational, posted by someone who hates on success or simply enjoys trolling. In retrospect, it’s quite possible medman77 had inside knowledge of the company.

It’s interesting to compare that against a different comment [1] made the following summer from someone with inside knowledge of the field but not of the company.

[1]: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=7951861

Re:The Coverage of Theranos Is Utter Bullshit (2015) by hitekker on Sunday January 02, 2022 @02:22PM (#29772576)
By "easily", you mean "lazily". It's one thing to assume the comment is irrational, it's another thing, and even lazier thing, to assume that the commenter hates on success or enjoys trolling.

It must be uncomfortable to see that our community was fooled. But blaming a whistleblower isn't the right coping strategy.

Re:The Coverage of Theranos Is Utter Bullshit (2015) by throwawaylinux on Monday January 03, 2022 @05:46AM (#29779400)
That time was possibly the peak for using baseless accusations of sexism to counter any criticism of women, at least in the online reddit/twitter/facebook/etc sphere. The old HN threads even have some. I feel people have been gradually getting slightly braver in standing up to this.
Re:The Coverage of Theranos Is Utter Bullshit (2015) by encryptluks2 on Sunday January 02, 2022 @02:27AM (#29766628)
You really don't need insider knowledge to make an assessment like that. You just have to learn what you look for when it comes to BS and be prepared to get some negative karma points for calling out companies due to the multiple social media PR companies they employ that use various reputation defense techniques.
Re:The Coverage of Theranos Is Utter Bullshit (2015) by tsol on Tuesday January 04, 2022 @01:51PM (#29798460)
Just because you're angry and irrational, doesn't mean that you're wrong. In fact one could argue being the only one to see the scam might itself make a lot of people angry
Re:The Coverage of Theranos Is Utter Bullshit (2015) by JohnJamesRambo on Saturday January 01, 2022 @11:45PM (#29765906)
I upvote now and send a tiny ripple into the fabric of the universe’s karma.
Re:The Coverage of Theranos Is Utter Bullshit (2015) by divbzero on Saturday January 01, 2022 @11:56PM (#29765959)
medman77 only ever posted that one comment and had karma of 81 as of just now (2022-01-02T04:53Z).
Re:The Coverage of Theranos Is Utter Bullshit (2015) by mdoms on Sunday January 02, 2022 @12:17AM (#29766055)
Why does he have a green username? I was always under the impression that green usernames were for newly created accounts.
Re:The Coverage of Theranos Is Utter Bullshit (2015) by umanwizard on Sunday January 02, 2022 @12:20AM (#29766074)
It was newly-created at the time the comment was posted.