iTerm2 3.4.14

Preferences > General > Preferences > Load preferences from a custom folder or URL

You can save your preferences and load them as required.

You entirely miss the point. Folk want to do this from a bootstrap script. iterm makes this difficult.

iTerm doesn't make a bootstrap script easy, but it's still possible. I do it.

Use this to command to set the location of the iterm config folder:

   defaults write com.googlecode.iterm2 PrefsCustomFolder -string "/path/to/iterm config folder"

Then as long as that folder exists and contains your preferred settings, when iTerm opens up it'll be exactly like you want it. (though it would have been nice if this just defaulted to $HOME/.config/iTerm)

There are a bunch of ways to do this while bootstrapping. Just store your iterm config in a dot files git repo, and then symlink it on a new system. You can even use dot bot to automate symlinks. That’s just one way of doing it, I’m sure there are many other ways.

It’s weird to hear someone proficient enough to be talking about bootstrapping a dev machine complain about solving a very trivial problem.

Here is my .tmux.conf. It includes a quick tutorial at the top of the file.

I have set PREFIX to be ctrl-a, which mimics GNU screen.

'Ctrl-a m' toggles "mouse" mode, which allows you to resize windows and set focus with the mouse.

https://raw.githubusercontent.com/jftuga/universe/master/tmu...

+1 for alacritty.

However now that I don’t daily drive mac as much, I’ve defaulted back to iTerm 2 for when I do happen to be doing something on my mac. The default configuration is quite good out of the box. All I really need to do post-install is get my beloved zsh + ohmyzsh plug-ins and I’m good to go :-)

And also my tmux dot files ;)

Kitty has more features and is easier to use than Alacritty IMHO

https://sw.kovidgoyal.net/kitty/

As a recent convert from Alacritty to Kitty, I can confirm this. Kitty blew Alacritty out of the water in the first 10 mins of my experience with it.

Like holy crap, it's a very well written and well thought out piece of software. And it's fast. I'm all about the Rust hype, but Kitty reduced latency drastically.

Still slower than xterm. And I have yet to see a feature I need that's not in (famously bloated) xterm, and which Alacritty or Kitty provide.

By what measure is it slower?

I don't really notice any difference in doing day-to-day stuff, but I tried out tree across my entire ~/projects dir and got the following results:

XTERM:

28032 directories, 196844 files tree projects 0.65s user 1.19s system 56% cpu 3.229 total

KITTY:

28032 directories, 196844 files tree projects 0.62s user 0.75s system 55% cpu 2.475 total

Latency and startup time are largest contributors to my feeling. I don’t have a measurement, and both are difficult to measure.

With Mac you can usually just copy your entire ~/Library/Preferences folder to get all your apps back the way they were on a new Mac. It's a collection of pliat files that basically are equivalent to the registry on Windows.

There's even a system wide equivalent at /Library/Preferences

For a very limited set of apps perhaps.

You also want ~/Library/Application Support

Of course if you're using a lot of cross platform stuff it tends to ignore those conventions in favor of a bunch of ~/.stuff/ folders

Yeah my post was not meant to be an exhaustive list of course :)

But apps that play by Apple's ideas do generally do this. Application Support is more for files rather than settings.