Re:Using the wrong dictionary (2014)
by serverlessmom on Thursday December 30, 2021 @03:46PM
(#29741240)
Wow! That's certainly a good one. A couple old favorites of mine are:
mullet – a hairstyle that is short at the front, long at the back, and ridiculous all around, and
regift – to give (an unwanted present) as a gift to another person, in a process which is likely to continue almost indefinitely.
Re:Using the wrong dictionary (2014)
by VladimirGolovin on Thursday December 30, 2021 @10:20AM
(#29737396)
A good éclair is certainly short in duration.
Except that I totally didn't get what "éclair" is.
Re:Using the wrong dictionary (2014)
by marginalia_nu on Thursday December 30, 2021 @06:52AM
(#29735989)
In which case you're probably looking for an encyclopedia, rather than a dictionary.
Re:Using the wrong dictionary (2014)
by wombatmobile on Thursday December 30, 2021 @07:13AM
(#29736087)
The word you are looking for is 'patisserie'.
Re:Using the wrong dictionary (2014)
by zamadatix on Thursday December 30, 2021 @02:21PM
(#29740338)
You'd go to an encyclopedia to find out the history, origins, detailed variations, regional specialities and so on about the topic of éclairs not to understand what an éclair itself is. A dictionary should perfectly well describe a thing without needing to pull out an encyclopedia and if you look at a updated/modern version of the Chambers Dictionary you'll get just such a definition: "A long cake of choux pastry with a cream filling and chocolate or coffee icing."
Anyone know of a good offline version for linux? (besides just searching within an ebook copy)
Re:Using the wrong dictionary (2014)
by interfixus on Thursday December 30, 2021 @11:18AM
(#29737961)
There is one linked in the article. Stardict format; any reasonable dictionary software will read it.
That appears to be a 2007 copy of Websters? I'm looking for Chambers. Seems that there isn't an ebook of it, just phone apps.
Discovered that their 13th edition accidently left out ~500 words:
https://chambers.co.uk/wp-content/uploads/2016/09/Chambers-M...
Does your modern version have that definition still?
Re:Using the wrong dictionary (2014)
by eatmygodetia on Thursday December 30, 2021 @08:52AM
(#29736672)
Yes. They removed a lot of the fun definitions in the nineties, but by popular demamd they were brought back!
I've always loved its definition of "éclair":
> "a cake, long in shape but short in duration"
[0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chambers_Dictionary