That costs $47 (US). The archiv article is free.

I think pointing out that it is published on a known journal is to display the fact that the paper is now peer-reviewed

Yes, that’s right. I wanted to highlight that this is a peer-reviewed article published in one of the top statistical journals.

Peer reviews dont mean much anymore these days.

Do you have a measure of low correlation to support that?

Regardless, I expect reviews are pretty straight forward for a concept that stands on its own like this one.

In answer to sister comment by derbOac:

Thanks for sharing this. On the other hand the cited paper clearly relates to interdisciplinary peer review.

I am not sure how or if this can be transferred to mathematics.

Perhaps to you. In academia we take them seriously.

In Math they really do.