News for hackers. Stuff that matters.
[dead]
Re:DARPA open sources resources to aid evaluation of adversa... by linschn on Tuesday December 21, 2021 @04:47PM (#29642519)
This reads like AI generated text. I literally can not understand what you are trying to say.
Re:DARPA open sources resources to aid evaluation of adversa... by the_optimist on Tuesday December 21, 2021 @05:00PM (#29642651)
It’s a copypasta proposal. The point is to cast aspersions and socialize a point of view without delivering information. Very social media-like.
Re:DARPA open sources resources to aid evaluation of adversa... by tonguez on Tuesday December 21, 2021 @05:10PM (#29642733)
Could you elaborate? The point of it is to asperse what exactly? What is the point of view that someone is attempting to socialize? That people should not care about privacy if they have nothing to hide?

So Big Brother has a bot create a post like this to make people think that other people want less privacy? Why wouldn't a bot just post something pre-written by an actual human instead of some weird collage of robotic-sounding sentiments like, "I look forward to bringing solutions to the US government"? That is not something a human would actually say. It it supposed to look like it was translated from another language? Is it just to waste our time trying to decipher it?

Re:DARPA open sources resources to aid evaluation of adversa... by the_optimist on Tuesday December 21, 2021 @09:18PM (#29644832)
It’s mere satire, wrought bitterly. Not written by a “bot.” The person who wrote it is a high IP leakage/theft risk on cynicism. Yes this is altogether a waste of time and brain cycles.
Re:DARPA open sources resources to aid evaluation of adversa... by CyanBird on Tuesday December 21, 2021 @04:54PM (#29642595)
It is just general US jingoism and fears of "the other" to retroactively try and excuse the expansion of the US military and military industrial complex onto "cyberspace " so as to avoid criticism for it
Re:DARPA open sources resources to aid evaluation of adversa... by AnimalMuppet on Tuesday December 21, 2021 @05:01PM (#29642653)
I think (hope?) that it's sarcasm. The last paragraph is the tip-off.
Re:DARPA open sources resources to aid evaluation of adversa... by superduperycomb on Tuesday December 21, 2021 @06:04PM (#29643196)
Whatever you say, skynet
Re:DARPA open sources resources to aid evaluation of adversa... by neatze on Tuesday December 21, 2021 @04:25PM (#29642302)
> Besides, if you did not do anything wrong, its not like you have anything to worry about.

Out of curiosity what do you mean specifically by this statement ?

Re:DARPA open sources resources to aid evaluation of adversa... by potatoman22 on Tuesday December 21, 2021 @04:40PM (#29642435)
I can't wait for the definition of 'wrong' to change so it includes more people :)
Re:DARPA open sources resources to aid evaluation of adversa... by rmbyrro on Tuesday December 21, 2021 @07:43PM (#29644066)
> The future of warfare is coming no matter what we do.

I wonder if they could have been more tautological

Re:DARPA open sources resources to aid evaluation of adversa... by xet7 on Tuesday December 21, 2021 @04:54PM (#29642591)
> Besides, if you did not do anything wrong, its not like you have anything to worry about.

AI already makes mistakes, detecting wrong people:

https://www.google.com/search?q=ai+detects+wrong+person

Re:DARPA open sources resources to aid evaluation of adversa... by pokepim on Tuesday December 21, 2021 @04:17PM (#29642217)
Did Edward Snowden do something wrong? Because he is treated by the government like he did but he actually helped humanity as a whole. Your comment reeks of hardcore military shilling...
Re:DARPA open sources resources to aid evaluation of adversa... by adventured on Tuesday December 21, 2021 @04:36PM (#29642394)
> Did Edward Snowden do something wrong?

Yes and it was still quite likely the correct choice/approach (how he went about it) in terms of the overall benefit to privacy globally (which seems to have been his aim).

Snowden could have attempted a few other legal approaches to being a whistleblower. The risk would have been far higher they would have buried him and the information in one form or another; they certainly would have tried. And even if he had succeeded through that channel, less information would have gotten out about what they were doing.

Doing something wrong doesn't always lead to a bad outcome or vice versa, there is no inherently fixed link there. Doing something right doesn't always lead to a good/positive outcome for example, that's one example I think more people can very easily relate to; and for the same reason that's true, the exact opposite is true.

Re:DARPA open sources resources to aid evaluation of adversa... by CyanBird on Tuesday December 21, 2021 @04:57PM (#29642627)
There's just no way that information about what was (is) going on would have come out to the public through normal channels, after all the very reason why Snowden did it was after senior nsa officials explicitly lied to congress about them spying on US citizens