News for hackers. Stuff that matters.

A comment on There’s no such thing as a tree (phylogenetically). Parent comment

Re:There’s no such thing as a tree (phylogenetically) by ajuc on Tuesday December 21, 2021 @04:34AM (#29635631)
Biology is what happens when you try to decompile code written in assembler into OO language.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:There’s no such thing as a tree (phylogenetically) by rightbyte on Tuesday December 21, 2021 @05:40AM (#29636024)
And when the systematics guys started out they did not even know the assembler code existed for like 200-300 years.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:There’s no such thing as a tree (phylogenetically) by kelseyfrog on Tuesday December 21, 2021 @02:27PM (#29641069)
They just classified by UI.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:There’s no such thing as a tree (phylogenetically) by pfdietz on Tuesday December 21, 2021 @07:37AM (#29636775)
Clade computing.
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:There’s no such thing as a tree (phylogenetically) by agumonkey on Tuesday December 21, 2021 @11:52AM (#29639230)
And publish a uml diagram of species
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:There’s no such thing as a tree (phylogenetically) by aitchnyu on Wednesday December 22, 2021 @02:17AM (#29646387)
Where a cat is a table extended with a .meow()
[ Parent | on HN ]
Re:There’s no such thing as a tree (phylogenetically) by ialyos on Tuesday December 21, 2021 @10:17AM (#29638145)
This comment is underrated
[ Parent | on HN ]